@funakoshi.gichin.shotokan: i mean, not to belabor this point too much, but ... gizmodo already did the original article in an earlier post.

@Tetsuooooooo: i agree; i had to really force myself through part three. i can see what rand's point is, but it seems to be based on a false dichotomy.

@TomXP411: haha yes. it's probably better that way, since i usually overskim when i have an actual book - it slows me down enough so i can digest it.

@Zshelley: well ... if the dustjacket fits.

@Ccomfort: the last half; i took nine months off (last school year), and just picked it up again once i got my nook.

matt, i would've argued this point with you ad infinitum a month ago. however, i've just recently purchased a nook, and i've burned my way through: fahrenheit 451; half of atlas shrugged; sh*t my dad says; and i, robot in the space of two weeks.

@Dys: i'd argue for more sense being made on part of the game. these players are a sad representation of what christianity should be. it's equivalent to judging all of islam by terrorists.

@forallintentsandpurposes004: i concur. the whole crowd of us IT guys.

@Dys: because i am the final authority on all things religious!!1!

@ChickenPotPython: dammit, that was funny

@Dys: hate the player (westboro) not the game (christianity).

@Applerain: even more than the articles?

@BadPlasmid: be honest, you got your hands on the keynote for tomorrow, didn't you?

i have groped for years ...

i think they should first update the user interface, maybe take a few ideas from microsoft this time. itunes is nothing more than a glorified database.

@plasticmouse: first stop is apple, inc. - i hear they have a few.

@mruler360: mmmyes

@mruler360: not even theoretically.

@ACEACEACE: i actually think you're just happy to see me

maybe they just updated the software and called it good.