You could print this image on placemats and have a dandy weight loss program.

Actually, this is how I always ingest cocaine, so I totally believe him.

“America: Love it or leave it” has always been an unAmerican sentiment. Just as Trump made implicit racism explicit, Trump has made explicit the implicit hatred of America in this kind of phony patriotism.

You’re welcome. Your comment was brilliant too. Sorry I forgot to say that.

Except that the video shows it *did* happen. Jordan -- who apparently can read minds -- is saying that even though it happened, he can tell from the look on Michelle Obama’s face that she really dislikes GWB and that it was an ironic hug. Perhaps Jordan can read my mind, which is unimpressed with this fact-free…

I think the expert is trying to simplify what he is saying for laypeople, but ended up being a bit confusing instead. A piece of music with a high tessitura “lives up high,” but it’s not correct to say that tessitura always means something high -- which is what it sounds like he’s saying even though I’m pretty sure…

True, but if you end up getting tackled short of the touchback line on a regular basis, you can lose your job for that too. It’s only “worth the risk” if -- on average -- you get more yards running it back than you would taking the knee.

It doesn’t matter whether the Muslims who live here want Sharia law or not (your chart summarizes a survey that included zero United States participants). The First Amendment forbids establishment of any religious law, and the Muslims in this country are far, far, far outnumbered by non-Muslims. I know Muslims…

Anyone who thinks it would be possible for the United States to “descend into Sharia Law” is an idiot. The point of this article is that if you want to frustrate terrorism, simply refuse to be terrorized. It’s not that hard. Just don’t shit your pants. I live in New York. There is a non-zero chance that a bomb will go…

Doing nothing would be preferable to doubling the size of the problem by shooting/jailing/marginalizing people for being drug users. So that’s one option.

We could also: 1) treat people who can be treated (i.e. weaned off drugs); 2) for people who can’t stop, mitigate the harm by allowing them to buy clean drugs…

Not to spoil the article for you, but if you skim down to the second-to-last paragraph, you find this:

To what purpose? Using police as the primary remedy for drug use is inexpressibly dumb. It doesn’t work. It fails to diminish the harm of drugs, and adds to that harm the harm of incarceration, violence, loss of employability, loss of rights, etc. It adds bullshit like this to the internet, which will follow this…

Moral of the story: “you’re not supposed to try on other people’s hats”? Mike Dukakis learned this the hard way.

It might make people think about the issue, which a lot of people haven’t done seriously, even though it is a serious issue. Other than that, you’re right: totally pointless!

I’m writing in Jill Stein for water commissioner. Won’t she be surprised when she wins!

Ok, so don’t.

Yes, people like Trump create a problem. Or like Peter Theil, for that matter. But rich people always have an advantage, whether it is the British or American rule that applies. The poor and middle class get can shut out of court entirely, however, if they are faced with having to pay their rich opponent’s legal fees…

And also please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_…

Again, the traditional rule in America, called “the American Rule,” is that in 95% of cases there is no question about fees to place before the judge: each side pays their own fees, win or lose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_…

I know that. See my response to Jessamina above.