It'd be rather silly for GM to pour the money into importing and marketing the current Cruze wagon, considering the Cruze can't be far from an upgrade.

It takes about two minutes to get to the car scene, but the bit from the Grand Theft Auto inspired short film RISE is pretty good. It's low budget, and plainly so, but still pretty great.

It's a double edged sword.

Were those comments made on the Mustang? I know they were made for the ATS coupe, didn't hear it on the Mustang. Although, to be fair, I largely ignored the new Mustang.

$13k for a new manual. Put down more and get Chevy's touchscreen system (standard on anything other than base (LS?)). Alloy wheels for all.

The new Cadi emblem looks fucking awful. It's just too stretched out. It seems to accent the roundness of the edges and makes the thing look like a snout-nosed joke.

None of these trump the Scion xB. xB? There's no vowels there! Is it ex-bee? cks-bu? cks-Bee!?

This looks awful. This looks like the sort of bland design you expect from a Grand Theft Auto ripoff of a car, not a real vehicle itself.

The Suburban name has been in production since 1933, according to Wikipedia, making it the longest running production car around. Technically I think this has to be the most improved, just from having gone through so many years of automotive advancing.

Neutral: Have You Ever Bought A Minivan? What was the overriding factor that had you choose one over another? Would you ever buy a minivan if you haven't?

Isuzu? Are they still selling Colorados or some shit?

GM better do a fucking good job with this shit.

I bought a Samsung Galaxy Note knockoff on Amazon once.

But rather cleverly. Not like a Family Guy joke, where the only reason it gets funny again is because you can't believe someone thought it was a good idea to keep one lame joke going for five minutes.

The Chrysler 200 is the cheapest midsize sedan and it looks amazing. Much better than anything American.

Okay, maybe not so much "confusing" as "annoying."

It's just, like, rambling. The guy seems to spend the entire video on different tangents. It's as if someone took a bad wannabe Jeremy Clarkson, and then for shits and giggles yanked out everything actually pertaining to a point, intending to create a mess of cynical assholism and a Wikipedia lurker trying to sound…

The government has no place running businesses. Not because "oh 1984 Obama is devil and government is trying run us all and take guns" but because they throw millions at companies like Fisker, who go bankrupt and never return the same money. Or at products like the Volt, which never really pays them back.

First of all, yeah, there is some truth to people not wanting to touch a business the government has stake in. Anyone who's not half retarded would look at this entity that looses billions annually itself while throwing millions at doomed companies like Fisker and products like Chevrolet Volt and go "I'm gonna stay…

Da Mercedes.