It amuses me greatly that your original comment has been forced into the greys.

And there ya go.

You are, don’t lie.

You don’t understand what a masterpiece is, do you? Because it’s very clear you don’t.

That’s fine, ignore him like everyone else who didn’t make a comment seeking attention and validation for their opinion.

And this:

And this:

Here, another video featuring something interesting using the actual GB hardware.

This also becomes even less interesting when you look through the source code on GitHub. There is not a chance in hell this could be done on real hardware, it requires an emulator to do as it’s the only way to call everything.

This also doesn’t use Yellow like how Kotaku describes, this wasn’t “all done in Yellow”. He…

Also, thanks, it’s good to know my computer is backwards compatible with the NES, GBA, PS1, PS2, GBC, Genesis, and anymore things you can think of for the sake of this condescending second response to what I strongly be a continually more idiotic defense to a marketing term.

My 3DS is apparently backwards compatible…

It’s an emulator. It’s limitations are the computer’s limitations. End of story.

Oh and it only scores 89.4% in an accuracy test.

This is not impressive even slightly.

It also reinforces my belief that TAS runs are invalid.

It’s emulation, you’re an idiot for falling for Microsoft’s marketing team.

He wasn’t getting sound from the Game Boy, he was getting it from an emulator. That is why it’s so crisp. The title and article are misleading, only acknowledging the use of an emulator once before promptly ignoring it.

Something impressive is using R/B as a cheating device on an actual piece of Game Boy hardware.

Don’t, it uses an emulator and isn’t that impressive.

He’s using an emulator, your professor’s reaction if he knows anything will be a mild “Huh, cool.”. This doesn’t use real hardware to do shit, the limit is what the computer is capable of handling.

Send this to him, it uses the actual Game Boy hardware.

via a Game Boy emulator

hacker

It’s emulation, not backwards compatibility.

For it to be backwards compatible it would need to be able to support all of the games, period.

Oh and hardware from the old console needs to be present. As it’s emulation through and through.

By your reasoning my computer is backwards compatible with the NES. It’s not, it’s…

Ok, seriously, it’s not backwards compatibility. Backwards compatibility is if they put 360 hardware in the Xbox One in order to play the games.

Instead, what they are doing is emulating through creative usage of a virtual PC that runs the entire 360 OS. It’s insanely complex and stupidly impressive.

In fact, it’s so…

So, what you’re saying is they get a great game that’s super old and a shitty game no one plays.

Nice.