Get those logical and well thought out points out of here, this is the Internet.

While I won’t comment about my views on Tesla stock, you should probably note a few things:

350Z Poor visibility and EXHAUSTING to drive.

It's the 25 or 6 to 4 model

Because RPM has little to do with fuel usage compared to other factors. It factors into the BSFC chart, but load is far far more important. I can rev my engine to redline in neutral and use much less fuel than full throttle, lugging my engine at idle.

The one the dealer puts on when you buy your new car/truck.

Happened to me on the flight back to LAX from Sydney. A whole row, empty but for me. Joke’s on me; sprung the extra 400 for Premium economy on Qantasa and the arm rests don’t go up.

Another big part of this discussion is the constant cutting of truck ground clearance in the name of aerodynamics, and of course the march toward unibody construction.

I’m not a legal expert, but I’m like 99% sure he’ll end up being forced to coach a hocky team of ragtag misfits. From what I’ve seen in the movies it usually works out surprisingly well.

Welp, FCA sure isn’t selling 200,000 a month to off-roaders.

Fake exhaust tips are bad, but when Tesla doesn’t put a fake grille on the cars, everyone freaks out.

Cheers, this was a good read!

They weren’t breaking new ground here, as a simple trip to Canada would have demonstrated.

Not as much as Volkswagen dealerships hate Volkswagen.

As the owner of 3 white 4Runners in my life, they hate us cause they aint us

That VAG sure can take a belting huh

Given the state of American roads in 2016, all cars now *ought* to be “off road” capable.