I prefer the Battletech way

Have you ever seen a beaver? Google one real quick and you'll notice the animal in the picture is missing the beaver's most recognizable feature.

I'm pretty sure Harold Ramis himself would have seen the humor here. I've heard him speak enough to guess his sense of humor would include his ghostly spirit being captured by the ghostbusters. Or especially his vengeful spectre attacking Chicago with a groundhog and Twinkies.

From what they said, blocking will be simple, but counterstrikes require the skills you built in M&B. The system is still basically in place, but with a small twist to make it more newb friendly. Easy to learn, hard to master kind of stuff.

ALPHANUMERIC!

More evil, yes. It remains to be seen if this new OCP is more corrupt than the OCP where a Dick Jones can give a product demonstration where an employee is shot six hundred times and still keep his job.

Usually when the coastguard guns up, it's for drug runners. CG usually sinks drug-boats after busting the runners. Or before, if they don't comply.

If you're asking why incendiaries specifically, it's because there's nothing boats hate more than fire.

He means the birds we call "seagulls" are technically just called "gulls."

I bet you think you're the mare of punville. Stop saddling us with your terrible jokes.

I started watching the "Threw it on the Ground" video a few comments over.... and now Renly's wink is synched with the bassline...

This comment pretty much made my day. Also, it ruined it.

DEATH FROM ABOVE!

I think people's problem may not lie with the movie itself (which looks very good) but with the lead actor. In most cases having Mr. Cruise as the lead will cause me to lose interest in a movie, such as his film with Cameron Diaz a few years back, but this one looks good enough for me to overlook my dislike of…

You must not be familiar with H.R. Geiger's work...

Generally we call them atheists too. Being an atheist just means you don't believe in any god or gods. You don't have to care about religion other than not being a part of any one of them. You could be agnostic if you believe there is something out there, you just don't know or don't care what it is.

They sit in a room and do nothing. The control group is there in case something strange happens. If that thing also happens to the control group, then they can surmise that whatever happened had nothing to do with the experimental factors. I've oversimplified, but that's basically it.

As men can we not be both fair and lustful?

You said it much more eloquently than I could (and I tried), without sounding like a jerk in the process. Bravo sir. You get a heart. I can only hope that I can express myself as clearly as this in the future.

Ack ran out of edits. Needed to also add an admission that while Palin did play the victim too often, that doesn't mean that the press was always fair to her. She was a victim, just not as often as she wanted it to seem.

Like some have already said, once the label is applied there is nothing someone as socially awkward as me can do about it. Every single thing you do is interpreted as further evidence of your creepiness. Even the things you don't do.