Is it generally considered okay for journalists to write about off the record conversations after a certain amount of time passes? From my outsider perspective, it seems kind of sleazy.

No corporations are going to be lining up to pay them money out of high school.

I really agree with this. If this article is reasonable on this day, why not publish a daily description of and links to videos of people fucking dogs or horses or children or passed-out women? All of those are on the same spectrum of horrifying and illegal rape of defenseless and non-consenting living beings.

Look, I seriously don't see why this is on Deadspin. I mean, it does not matter if this is against the law or not, it is wrong, and part of the reason it even exits is because some fuck who would be better off not even on the planet with the rest of us posted it so people would look at it which gets him off. If there…

I am extremely confused as to why this video, of all the probable horrifying content on the internet, was selected for promotion today.

PENDING APPROVAL

don't know who decided deadspin dot com was the depository for bestiality posts, but thank you.

I thought the change to the comment system was supposed to prevent stuff like this from being posted.

This is literally a humorous description of animal abuse.

Is this supposed to be a hot take?