Technically its when he's destroying others.
Everyone is in competition to be king of the wasteland.

Its easy to make robots that kill. So long as your indiscriminate about who they kill.
Soldiers alway have the advantage when it comes to judgement.

They usually aren't killed by the computer, per say. They're killed by all the unwise things they do to their body leading up to a multiple day bender.

They could, assuming that those designing solar roof installs don't get there on their own first, but its the unused space on the roads that this project is after. We've got more road area than roof area and its all just baking in the sun.
Meanwhile we're tearing up new land to install traditional solar panels and…

It all comes down to the durability of a solar panel road tiles.

I FIND THIS OBJECTIONABLE!!

Seriously, turquoise?
Did I fall through a wormhole into the nineties or something?

If new PC build ends up only being able to run some of the games then it IS a serious threat to everything that PC gaming represents. The open platform, high end, backwards and emulative compatibility is what the whole show is based on.

At the same time tho most indi games cost less and many are free.
The whole point is that its not locked into the $60 console game model. That's why people are willing to pay less for less game.

Maybe I'm odd, but I look at the console box for like a half second before just plugging it in and playing the damn thing. I don't think I've ever given two farthings for the outer shell of a computer unless I'm tasked with opening it up to fix something.

What if the spy IS the dog?

Sort of. Star citizen is mass multiplayer, so you can do this if you can raise an army of fellow players. The graphics will certainly be better.
This is more like first person homeworld, single player strategy (which would be better if it was actually set in homeworld...).
That said, I dig the idea.

Sounds like something I'd enjoy... but this whole business with Zenimax is pissing me off, so maybe later.

It is the future of display technology. If not now then eventually it will happen.
Doesn't matter how high you crank the monitors resolution because you're still looking through a window as opposed to being there in person. VR is presently the only method we have for stepping through the looking glass.

I don't see a problem with paying a successful studio to do something that it can't get backing for. Its been known for some time that publishers are infatuated with COD and Grand theft clones, so its not hard to explain why you can't get funding to do the game you truly want to do.

I think it may be a matter of…

There isn't much else to know.
Zenimax didn't pursue VR when they had Carmack on their staff all these years, and they didn't have an issue with Oculus making goggles with Carmack's help (which has also been happening for years) until Palmer came into a fat wad of cash.

NOW can we boycott Zenimax?

So many backgrounds, so few desktops...

Fifty years ago this kind of thing might have been normal and outright acceptable.
Technically it still is today.

They're more likely buying it so they can "manage" all that game content.
(manage it right into the internets memory hole)

Which begs the question if the marines haven't been circling my house... I'm getting one bar and sitting in line of sight with a tower!

Also wondering why they're canning good planes and systems like this in favor of hundred billion dollar crap, but thats another matter.