Everyone retelling the epic story of how Galyn “Saved TS2" always omits the tiny fact that Pixar scrapped that version of TS2 entirely and started over anyway.

Sure would suck for the artists if most copyright laws had some kind of carve-outs and exemptions for transformative works, which AI art undoubtedly is (You may not like how it transforms things, but it does).

Can’t wait for everyone who doesn’t like AI Art to learn about procedural generation.

NDAs don’t run counter to the idea of free speech unless you are a free speech absolutist, which Musk doesn’t seem to be.

Do people still buy amiibos? cloning them to NFC cards is so cheap and easy now that basically any gameplay mechanic unlocked by amiibos may as well just be given away free

The only Subways in London sell footlong sandwiches

So...they allowed Luz to participate *just* long enough to get the donations and attention from him, then decided they had a moral stance to take?

Down in Fraggle Rock?

It’s horrible, but it’s also effective. Lots of horrible things are also effective and that’s why they’re done.

Kinda feel bad for the older brother who just got his account banned because lil’ Timmy (sorry, lil’ Patrick) just HAD to be a streamer

Lots of people comparing this to Driver San Francisco and completely overlooking the fact the “possess any NPC” mechanic has been done before:

Notice how his streak rarely hits double digits and he tends to play songs without walls? This is just mindless flailing and the fact Ethan considers it "effective" is laughable 

I wish I was surprised that this still needed saying in 2019

He would have to be convicted and sentenced before he could serve some jail time. He’s only been charged so far, punishment comes much later

As a homage to Smallville, she’ll find out, have her mind wiped, know something is odd and obsessively try to uncover the lost memories, succeed, almost die, lose memory again from being shot and then turn evil

While there’s no doubt that Sapkowski is an asshole who let his greed and prejudice against video games blind him to the possibility of a successful video game series based on his books, that doesn’t make him wrong (in the legal sense, anyway) - Article 44 seems specifically designed for this sort of situation, where…

IANAL, but if she wants to annul the settlement then surely she’d have to pay back the $375,000 paid to her, right?

“Porter admits her boyfriend was wearing socks while in contact with the pool water. There is a sign that says socks are not allowed in the pool.”

Seeing a lot of quotes and comments via email from Price in this article but only two mentions of Deroir and no sign anyone’s contacted him for comment.  

But do they count “Affected” as “Requested their own information and got somebody else’s instead” or “Unknowingly had their details given out”?