Huh, funny. Because I work IT and we have Macs and Dells as well, and I’ve gone out on way more calls about those Dells fucking up than I have on Macs. Mostly I’ll get stupid silly things from Macs that’s always the user’s fault, and that’s at a quarter of the rate I get the same calls from PC folks.

The advice I give to people: if you think love is an emotion, and not a choice, then you’re not going to be with that person for forever

Nah, natural selection says the person who has the most sex will pass on their genes to the next generation.

You’re great thank you I cannot understand how they are so popular. My partner likes them. This will be the factor.

This is LAX I can testify from experience they do have the size things

My specialty is philosophy of language so particularity plays a great deal into what I do.

Pedantic.

You should know then that Japan’s economy is in the shitter enough where Abe is crazy enough to gear up for war with China/North Korea. Abe is probably ticked, but also happy that another loon is in office.

This is interesting. (But reason isn’t really the domain of cognitive science, neuroscience, or linguistics. It falls under epistemology. Although theoretical linguistics blends into philosophy of language which draws a lot from epistemology and logic.) Next semester I’m teaching formal logic to high schoolers, albeit…

...except in the cases of conditional proof and (sorta) RAA.

It depends on what school of thought you’re talking about. Sophism posits that truth is in rhetoric, Cartesian thought posits that all truth originated from an a priori idea, logical positivism posits that truth originates from external observations, Davidson posits that you can’t have one type of truth without the…

...I wasn’t saying it wasn’t. I’m saying BoP is the stronger argument you could make.

I’d much rather go for a burden of proof criticism here instead of clearing up epistemology.

All empirical claims can be formulated into a system of formal logic. (Well, depending on the order of the logical system needed. All higher-order systems are either incomplete or inconsistent. I think this one could be translated into first order predicate logic just fine.)

Strictly speaking, you can indeed prove a negative in formal logic but...

hey I’m a town over it looks like it’s all good

it’s not OC red lmao.

what the fuck have you been smoking

To be far we have a lot of solutions. People like you just say that it will never work or the person we’re voting for doesn’t know what they’re talking about.

macOS and a Linux distro preinstalled. UNIX all the way.