Did Cranston's cover the same ground or was that more focused on specific events? I haven't seen it.
Did Cranston's cover the same ground or was that more focused on specific events? I haven't seen it.
Come on, guys. You and many other people in the media laugh at the note, and decide that the kid is probably someone they made up… Then you find out he's real and it's all, "Well, so what if he's real???"
Sure, but there could also be a gorilla in there. How about "Moon Primate"?
I'm not completely against that idea in general. Changing job titles to be gender-inclusive, or calling someone "Person of the Year", etc, but this one just seems pointless and unnecessary. The statue is basically just a character called "Moon Man". No one is aspiring to BE a Moon Man, that's the just the name of the…
That's the Scully paradox. "Aliens, Mulder? You're crazy!" "Yeah, but remember we met some last week?"
I guess though the whole question is about vengeance, justice, cruelty, etc… I think most of us have the two sides of the brain, one that likes the idea of making the criminal suffer for his crimes or dispassionate justice with the idea of avoiding cruel and unusual punishment. But generally our idea of justice is "we…
Kinda stupid, ain't it? The very existence of a gender does not exclude others. The award isn't saying "this is for men". It just happens to be a man. Granted, the whole point of this was to create a controversy and immediately be on the moral, tolerant side of it.
It seems crazy that he has so little to say about Batman, given how he did such a great job in that!
Subtitles? You mean it's a movie I gotta read? What am I, a college professor?
It's probably way too late to comment after 1500 other comments, but it's also notable that the leaders around the table in Dany's war room are women, while Cersei has become queen and Jon Snow has made Sansa the temp queen. And is it good or bad that all the women are becoming as stubborn and arrogant as all the dead…
FINALLY! A movie set in New York!
Was that scene with Jorah and Sam played for laughs? I didn't feel like it was at all. I was cringing because it seemed to painful. Though I guess the cut to the pie was sort done as a laugh.
As others have said, it's publicity and interviews he hates. But to be honest, I really have gotten sick of the attitude. Sometimes he can be funny, obviously joking around with his surly reputation. But, come on…
Like everyone, I'm impressed with badass Arya but (and maybe I'm being too sensitive here) few people seem to be noting it is also sad what she has become. A remorseless, sometimes cruel and twisted killer who seems to enjoy what she's doing. I think we all once looked forward to her being some amazing warrior but now…
I always find it interesting to be reminded that Cersei still believes Tyrion and Sansa conspired to kill Joffrey. I wonder what many of the others believe. I'm sure Jaime doesn't believe Tyrion did it, and I doubt he'd really think Sansa capable. Is there anyway Cersei could find out the truth? She probably wouldn't…
"Unfortunately, nothing much happens in the rest of the episode either." This again? From what I've seen most people enjoyed the episode and found Sam's montage to be a good laugh. Sorry, but we need these "table setting" episodes now and then. Can't have all action all the time. There's way to much build up for…
My point was they didn't mention the AT&T ads at all. They are of course going to mention her TV shows, too.
Right. From "This is Us." What is this, some SAG website that requires mentioning a real acting job, when most people know her as the AT&T girl?
Right. I believe that many Catholics have decided that it's meant to be symbolic, but that's not the official doctrine.
"Made damn sure?" Was someone like, trying to drag them to get baptized when you weren't looking?