"Jameis will do just fine in the draft...and the NFL" <winks>

This is exactly why the Bentley’d up Ford Taurus is the way to go...I dig it, and I like the 300. I do not like the faux Bentley kits added onto some 300’s.

Neutral: A Lincoln on the streets, and a Volvo shooting brake between the sheets.

Oh, that one just looks like a completely ridiculous caricature - no international automaker in their right mind would build that.

Buckminster Fuller's Dymaxion car, which was essentially a 3 wheeled bus. Three built, one rolled (unsurprisingly) and killed the driver at the 1933 World's Fair http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dymaxion_…

$120k is waaay too much for what they have done, IMHO.

I can see the point of doing it with a bread and butter Mustang - this just isn't how I would do it

Damn...there are too many choices, you could almost break this down by year! In the metro Detroit area, I'd say this was the most ordinary car of the later 1980's (edit, not sure if I'm getting Kinja'd, but it's a Ford Tempo):

You shouldn't have said this; now pet owners/lovers are going to insist there are airbags designed for cats, dogs, ferrets(yuck), etc...

***unless it is warmer or colder than 60-80 degrees Fahrenheit, then your range will be lower.

Yes! ...and PHEV minivans - a Volt minivan.

USA? Wagons go on the list, not to be mister obvious... I think the truly small truck is the biggest missing piece in our market. The Ranger was still selling well before they discontinued it. I'm guessing those pesky regulators and their new crash standards have killed the small truck forever.

YES, AND AS INTERESTING AS THE DEFLATED FOOTBALLS ARE, I AM EVEN MORE INTERESTED IN WHAT THEY MIGHT HAVE DONE TO THE COLTS GAme balls...oh sorry, caps lock was on.

Since no one will be going around hitting trucks with sledgehammers (other than your psycho ex-girlfriend), I am kind of curious why they didn't do a low impact crash into the bed side instead. I suppose the risk for underlying damage is too much.

The Patriots were just about a lock to win this game...but I am sure that deflating balls are the tip of the iceberg in their cheating methodology. Whatever, they are good at it. Also, I am a Lions fan...so I can do nothing else with the information in statement 4 but empathize with your NFC North inadequacies.

"he must maintain control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground" - The ball contacting the ground? Or the player? If the player, how much of his body needs to contact the ground before he is considered down and it is either a catch and fumble and recovery, or alternatively he is down by…

First round picks? I think you need to look at second and third round picks, hell, they all suck.

Yeah, I am backing off that catch statement a bit, after watching it over again. I did read the rules correctly, the video on my computer is choppy - I have a new video card on order. Once I receive it, I will make my final call on this matter, har har...

I know, that roof would have been such a radical, unusual design...maybe someday.

Okay, alright... I think it's bad interpretation of the rule book, a matter of semantics - I may be wrong, but I don't think this is what the rule was written for.