erick0077
Erick0077
erick0077

My stomach must be a graveyard.

It’s CRR’s motion for injunctive relief, so the motion was granted, not denied.

It’s Jezebel. Being passive aggressive and bitchy over nothing is their bread and butter.

It’s far more costly as a society to have so many people be uninsured.

The hilariously sad part of all this is that he’ll be a step up from some of the people there, like Milo and gang.

According to him, it’ll be Mexico.

Trump and his supporters are so goddamned shortsighted. Do they realize how much it will cost to deport or incarcerate that many people (in money, not even talking about the fucking emotional toll to the families and communities that will be dismembered)??

when someone bigger than you threatens sexual acts that you’re not into

Why would this level of detail matter if its intention was to keep it private among their friends? I feel like this is just fodder for people who are yearning to become upset and indignant. I mean, my goodness, the women who issued a written response to this leak talked about how these men feel entitled to women’s

The power structure IS relevant. it’s extremely relevant. it’s the most relevant thing, here.

Certainly, but in the example provided, the comments were about women.

Is someone an asshole for evaluating prospective mates, though? I mean, unless we’re dealing with Buddhist monks, most of us are shallow and do take into consideration others’ looks when contemplating whether we’d want to approach them for sex/intimacy/romance/etc. Sure, many of us have the good sense and decency not

The association of this to Trump’s comments is silly. Trump’s comments are objectionable because he’s passing off clear sexual assault (i.e., grabbing women inappropriately without their consent) as if it were crass talk among close friends. However, this behavior WAS merely crass talk among close friends. Nothing in

It’s certainly crass and juvenile, but it’s not clear it’s necessarily misogynistic. This behavior, after all, is present even when extracting women from the equation, such as how many gay men talk about other men.

So you’re undermining a study, which grapples with quantitative data, by the use of an anecdote? Were you a liberal arts major in college by any chance?

Sure, a name is a name insofar as they have no inherent or intrinsic meaning or attachment to any one race or creed, but there are certainly undeniable trends in names chosen by certain communities. There are many more black girls named Tamika than white ones. Ignoring this isn’t combating racism; it’s perpetuating

So everyone here, as is expected on Jezebel, is up in arms over his slut-shaming and respond by being snarky and passive aggressive, but in the process end up shooting themselves in the foot. Isn’t the feminist critique — at least one prominent version of it — that society is imposing upon women scantily-clad costumes

This reminds me of a Click Hole post titled: