erichlippert
ErichLOL
erichlippert

We tried your bleeding edge Windows-based Infotainment system and IT SUCKED!

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, THESE SYSTEMS ALL SUPPORT BOTH ANDROID AND IOS.

Touché, my intent wasn't to burn, just pointing out something that I thought was funny. Ironically, I failed at being an internet grammar Nazi.

Ironically, as a journalist your first sentence has a typo that makes absolutely no sense.

Back in the Pre-OS X days, Apple did used to bundle things like: Internet Explorer, Outlook Express, Quicken Trials, Claris/AppleWorks Trials, AOL & Earthlink, etc. Not nearly as annoying as the crap that infests your systray in Windows that actively nags you, but it did happen for a while in the world of Apple.

Samsung's Android smartphones are actually far more prolific and mainstream than Motorola's or HTC's.

I realize that the Lexus ES is just a tarted up Camry, but Wikipedia seems to imply the opposite order. Of course, it is Wikipedia. My parents owned a first gen ES 250 and I recall them paying well under 30K for a barely used one off of lease, which makes the 30K 90's Camry sound even more absurd. Did the Camry

I'd say a dirt bike beats them both at tight trails, where a trike really shines is in the sand, with a high revving 2-stroke!

Rather have the 250R 2-stroke model.

Right, at the time would you ever had expected that in as few as 15 years, people would be favorably cross-shopping Hyundais and Kias against Camrys and Accords? I sure as hell didn't; look at how well all the 90's Hyundais on the road have held up since then, if you can even find em. Their cars were terrible back

Hey, I was driving when this Camry was the contemporary appliancemobile of the year (♫ I love what you do for me... TOYOTA! ♫). It wasn't universally loathed by gearheads as much as it is today, but it certainly wasn't regarded at the time as a highly desirable car either; so my completely subjective opinion still

Almost 30 grand in today's dollars for a lame-ass 90's Camry is crazy talk, I'd rather have two 80's Rabbits for that coin.

Uh... why don't these assholes just simply admit defeat and revoke that bad root CA!? Problem easily solved with a single remote kill switch.

I replied to the wrong comment, D'oh!

Making hydrogen currently is an energy net loss, then there're all the storage issues.

It's the Betamax of the automotive world.

How the hell do you exceed 100% efficiency without violating established laws of physics?

I wonder what the range is like when you have several months of commuting in the -ºF with that resistive electric heat blasting the entire commute, just to keep the windows clear and stay relatively warm?

Its something called a net energy loss, look it up. Also see the energy inputs to Ethanol production for another frame of reference. We're essentially trading "cleaner" energy for far less efficient energy.

Meanwhile, the EPA is forcing coal and even natural gas plants that supply capacity and reliable base-load electricity to shut down with recent regulations. Yeah, lets all plug our multi-KW vehicles into the grid now! I won't be surprised if regular brown-outs become a normal thing here in coal country, not like the