This is why my “racecar” project 3000t VR4 has 170k miles and my “show car” project ‘04 M3 has 66K. If all you want is to look at a thing then the lower miles are often more likely to be body work free (not even close to a guarantee though). If you want something to drive then get something that’s been taken care of…

Mitch deserves a direct quote with proper citation, not just his words lifted from a google search.

I can’t tell the difference.

TVR’s of the past cost an arm and a leg though. Well, that is what the fire crews had to field amputate as they hauled the remains of the owners out of a fiery wreck in a field when they went over 30mph.

100% this. CUV’s are the bane of my existence. They serve no purpose other than to make their owners feel “safer” and “more capable" even though they're driving around in jacked up Fusions and Malibus. You're right though, an all electric crossover will sell very well.

11. Dead puppy smell.

it should be nicknamed the b’Gosh. it will make the current crop of soldiers mots likely to be operating nostalgic for the jeans and overalls their mothers bought them for their first day of first grade.

This is amazing journalism.

Have fun with that.

That is a Ford Fusion

Without a doubt it is the Aston Martin DB9. Still gushed over 12 years after it’s debut. Hell, there weren’t any reasonable grumblings about it being an “old” design until a few years ago. I believe those criticisms were made only because someone realized that it was 10 years old and unfair to every other car to still…

Peter Horbury did some of his best work on the P2 Volvo S60. These still look great today. Volvos in general are some of the most timeless cars on the road.

Starting in the 2000 model year, the Honda S2000. Take an older style, originally brought back by the Miata, but then get Honda to challenge it with this beautiful aggressive modern guy.

But only because it stole it from the 1960s

Before anyone starts with the E39 started in the 90s crap, keep in mind the M5 didn’t start (EDIT: US) production until 2000.

Assuming we can look at it in a realistic way, number two is the correct choice because of one particular loophole.

Consistent reports here.

I know this is a joke, but I wish it wasn’t.