I played the 9 real concerts 1 fake concert game on Facebook on Wednesday (my twist was that they were all free concerts with nationally known names), but nobody bothered guessing mine.

Hmm…reading the Wikipedia article, I stand corrected on the mystery thing. I had always heard that was shot. But the film certainly was much more sprawling and less focused on the Annie/Alvy relationship in the first cut.

I think TGGP's point was that they didn't in the case of Annie Hall. They found the movie in the editing.

My girlfriend turned me onto Jonathan Demme movies, as she was a fan. When we'd watch Something Wild, Married to the Mob, Rachel Getting Married, or even Silence of the Lambs, I noticed a connecting theme to his work, no matter how eclectic his range of genres reached. It seemed his protagonists were often people who…

Even sweepstakes usually restrict contest entrants to people that haven't worked for the company, or are related to people who work for the company. Such a restriction should be in place for holding public office. It's no more arbitrary than age or even place of birth in an increasingly small world.

Sweet Baby Roy didn't necessarily vote for Trump, and might even have voted for Clinton. Again, there's the assumption that criticizing the campaign is the exclusive domain of non-Clinton voters.

There's no need to guess though. Check out Thomas Frank's books "What's the Matter with Kansas?" and "Listen Liberal" for a start. He's predicted this for decades through an analysis of exactly what you're talking about.

Constructive analysis of Clinton's campaign isn't exclusively conducted by people who didn't vote for her.

Trump seems to be waging a competition with her on that front.

The sad thing is, the Clinton campaign literally started by corralling reporters in rope. The media are cowards, complicit in selling the narrative corporations tell them to. Their coverage of every aspect of the 2016 election was beyond abysmal.

Yes, but the methodology matters, now more than ever.

One in which it took scheduling debates on competitive nights, removing or changing party status of voters who changed party and/or registered in time and correctly from the voting rolls without consent, covering Sanders for under 10 minutes by outlets like ABC News, the news media insisting on including…

Plus, getting a third party to meet popular vote percentage thresholds would at least get them included in future debates so that there would be a greater diversity of perspectives on stage, whether the candidates would be viable or not. And if a third party built momentum, then a fourth could as well.

Trump's tactics on race were more that Sanders capitulated to BLM protesters by allowing them to speak, and even hiring BLM activists in high-ranking positions in the campaign.

I'm mad that Lessig qualified for the second debate, yet CNN openly courted Biden to come on by showing him an empty podium, that could have been used for someone who actually declared his candidacy.

Whether or not a competitive primary is good for a party, open primaries with a competitive roster of candidates not funded by corporations and lobbyists is better for democracy than a system with no primaries or little competition.

It's similar to the Kinsey Scale?

"I'm With Her" was a flawed slogan that only reinforced the narrative that it was about her. It would have been so simple to flip the slogan to "She's With Us."

I don't think the Johnson voters would have necessarily gone for Clinton over Trump. And across the country, Johnson voters tended to outnumber Stein voters by about 2:1.

If you do agree, then I'm glad to see a colleague in the fight for Ranked Choice Voting, that has volunteered and/or donated to local and/or national campaigns on the issue such as Maine's Question 5 last fall.