Anyways, that thing is something that a critic doesn’t get. He will watch the movie by himself, alone, with a brain that has been damaged by too many years of studying the subject instead of experiencing it.
Anyways, that thing is something that a critic doesn’t get. He will watch the movie by himself, alone, with a brain that has been damaged by too many years of studying the subject instead of experiencing it.
I think theyre not because they’re laughing at the mess of DC. CA:CW was pretty good
We love it when our favorite sites get a hold of our work. Thanks!
“IS THAT HAYDEN??? OH MY GOD, IT’S HAYDEN, ISN’T IT!? WHY WOULD THEY DO THIS TO ME!?”
It seems kinda trifling to just like every thing she posts.
Okay but it also has a clause preventing you from bringing up their supposed sanctimony when none of them has even said anything to you.
It might be equally unlikely that he would have been president without her. They support each other’s ambitions and like most couples, drive each other’s destinies.
Okay?
Obvious comment is obvious.
You’re reading a “... for Hillary” where this post does not include one. Donald Trump does not do anything for anyone who is not Donald Trump.
Seems to me they euthanized the wrong goddamn animal >:(
I see what you did there.
io9 is total Marvel fanboys, man. They crap all over DC and it’s a conspiracy.
Not what they are saying at all. The critics say it is bad, not Jezebel.
Mild and appalling are not antonyms. Also, I don’t get how you read this and think he isn’t calling it sexist.
“What if we did the Avengers, but with lesser known characters and none of the setup movies?”
If Wikileaks was dumping innocent people’s Social Security Numbers and Credit Card Info just because they were RNC donors, there would be an article. It may be a bit more condescending, but it would still happen.
People who run political party are biased toward a candidate with a long history in their party, rather than someone who wasn’t in the party until he announced he was running for president?
Would you like to cite any sources on those corruption claims?
I mean, even the leaked emails fro the DNC barely shed any insight at all. The “worst” emails show a very slight personal preference or distasteful sentiment from a few players. With such a giant dump of files, nothing showed anything that led to actual bias or improper action on the part of the DNC. It’s basically…