Steve, it’s a Civic Hatchback with an RDX grille on it.

Well, I’m glad the folks at Volvo aren’t as elitist and exclusionary as you are. I for one am rather intrigued by the EX30.

They aren’t, they don’t pay the tax credits and rebates, residents do. 

I think that, oddly, most of them are not trying to look like a 1930s car. They are trying to look like a 1960s Brook Stevens Excalibur, which was trying to look like a 1928 Mercedes SSK.

I agree with your comment, but I went a reluctant ND. My reason was I just couldn’t think of who would like this? I mean, it’s too old to be a car for someone that just wants reliable transportation, but it’s not the right version for an enthusiast. Tough call for me.

C’mon, it’s used correctly.

NP
Same thought. Looks like a nice deal but I would only look at a manual twin turbo.

No according to the porn you’re addicted to.

Elon said his mean-spirited thing (because his daughter hates him), Jalopnik wrote an opinion piece. You shared a stupid comment and I replied to your stupid comment. Free speech all around.

Instead of timeline I probably should have just stuck to the original question of what design unexpectedly held up. I definitely did not think the 300 would remain a good design almost 20 years after they introduced it.

I have no idea why I feel this way, but I feel like the 2004-2008 Acura TL has aged pretty well. Especially in Type S trim.

Is the Chrysler 300 old enough to be considered timeless now? It can officially vote this year, but is still a few years from legal drinking age, so maybe that’s more of a prediction.

The ‘99-02 Mercury Cougar. I don’t see these much on the road anymore but I had one of these and thought they looked very unique and sleek for their time (and still do now). My high school girlfriend called it a “spy car.” Such a stark move away from it’s older sibling.

As a Californian who semi-regularly drives I-80 through the Sierras in winter - and over the Grapevine and other mountain West mountain passes, I *really* appreciate the AWD in my TourX. It’s saved me from getting out and chaining up in a blizzard at least two dozen times since I bought the car.

In fairness, “German Engineering”, not “German Quality”. I’ve come to understand German engineering = overly complex, fragile, and requiring constant maintenance.

Seriously? No Mazda CX-5..??

Civic customers aren’t interested in a coupe. Integra customers absolutely are.

No, a pointless money grab would’ve been building a small HR-V based crossover and badging it as an Integra. 

Enthusiasts demand a manual, but in this day and age I HAVE to wonder if that being the only option will impair its sales.