You just shouldn’t let your emotional reaction determine a company policy without also putting decisions through a more rational, measured process.

Hooey

He said in general, which is undeniably the case.

Wow, talk about hypocritically displaying bias and ignorance. Either that or you are completely accurate, which ironically supports this guy’s point about certain undeniable characteristics about any group.

Women in general are more physiologically prone to anxiety, that is a fact whether you like it or not. All the author is saying is that blindly avoiding those types of realities and forming policies around that ignorance is not the best path forward for Google.

The brain is not a muscle and isn’t, except for a narrow definition, analogous to one. Re are limitations for us all and generalities do actually apply to ethnicities and genders whether that makes you uncomfortable or not.

Bingo, the name calling and recriminations are flowing fast and loose.

He didn’t ask for empathy, he asked for a rational approach to ethnic and gender differences instead of insistence on fanatical devotion to the company line.

You probably are also shocked that in a pure meritocracy, like say an NBA team, there aren’t a bunch of women and Asian men. There are, in general, identifiable differences in ethnicities and genders that may lead to positives and negatives in individuals pursuing specific careers. Turning a blind eye to it while…

Your second point supports the author’s broader point that men and women, in general, are indeed inherently different.

I’ve never met you and have definitely made some judgements about the merits of your comments, so you might just have a point.

Nice work...enjoy your phone tap.

I can’t remember an article in recent memory with such poorly formulated, vitriolic opinions and questionable advice. While you cast pebbles those recently elected move boulders.