eoj1
EOJ1
eoj1

I assume that Lars Gange took these shots, so please give credit to the photog.

The future called. Their eyes aren’t ready for it either.

Production version (after delays and cut-backs):

A man in Akron, Ohio has pooped on 19 cars parked in driveways in the last few days. Pooped. Like, out of his butt. I don't really know what else to say.

You failed to mention that car brakes actually contribute to global warming! Have you ever felt the heat that comes off those things?

But see, that's not actually what I believe, because I don't believe that George W. Bush was capable of such a feat. To say "George Bush lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction" would be something I would never actually say.

From what I can find, armoring a car roughly halves efficiency, so given 270 miles of range for the S85D, that would be 135 miles. So realistically you probably can still get about 100 miles of range, which is probably plenty for its purposes.

If you can afford a GT-R or a Hellcat, you can afford a track day.

2.0L with 350HP and 500 lb*ft of torque? And it ISN'T a diesel?

Until the SRG-NRC-GTC (Super Rich Guy Not a Race Car Gran Touring Championships) become a thing I just aint care. Ferrari XX program against the Zonda F program against GTR program against...all comers. Make it happen rich peoples.

I was thinking about AI and the singularity last night, when I started thinking about synapses, axons, dendrites, etc. My thoughts ended up wondering that, at some point, is it more efficient to use chemical signals like a biological brain than semiconductor chips. My thought being that our brains have billions of

That's Google who will do that.

I think Elon Musk is going to invent Skynet. Here's how:

Wait, burning fossil fuels is good for the environment? I didn't know that. As for me, if you knew me or what I do, you would know I am a massive supporter of motorsport, racing, V12 Italian hypercars, old, inefficient sports cars and smoky burnouts.

You seem to have just discovered the journal three days ago, like most of the world, and seem to be extremely clueless about what you wrote. Charlie Hebdo has a long list of cartoons and articles mocking, belittling, spitting on the French racist parties like the Front National or MNR. They were even attacked on court

Oh yeah, forgot to mention, that they were ALL, and I mean ALL OF THEM, ANTI-RACIST... And publicly. But since you can't grasp the idea of what satirical drawings are, and apparently have no knowledge or whatever of what this newspaper is, you obviously can't know that...

You may think that you just need to scrape off the glass, and you'd be wrong. You'll realize this the first time you have to come to a quick stop.

Shouldn't this article be