entropyjukebox--disqus
EntropyJukebox
entropyjukebox--disqus

I agree, for the most part - "It wasn't rape because she didn't say no and threesomes are fun!" vs. "real" rape (where the victim is more "perfect"). I do wonder how this will play out moving forward. I can't see them toting this film around to college campuses, claiming it will aid the conversation about sexual

Maybe. But Celestin WAS actually convicted, initially, and spent some amount of time in jail. How far from their minds could it realistically have been? Even if those two didn't consider what they had done to be assault of any kind, they had to have known OTHER people could potentially see it that way. It's why Parker

Yes, put an actual rape victim front and center to deflect attention from the rapist. On a lighter note, "binders full of women":
https://www.amazon.com/prod…

Ugh. Sickening. He claims he hadn't thought of her once, in 17 years. The whole situation is just too awful and upsetting. I might be able to watch the movie 10 years from now, but probably not.

Part of the issue for me is that he is also the star. I know for sure that I wouldn't be able to look at his face on screen, closeup after extreme closeup, showing his character's pain reacting to his wife's rape, and not become completely sick at the gross hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance. I just wonder how he and