i don’t see what the big deal is. it literally looks like any other sports car.
i don’t see what the big deal is. it literally looks like any other sports car.
“That washer is not going for a ride.” - Colin Chapman
No.
That car is stunning.
Well played.
I thought they changed it because it was too similar to a Ford Fusion.
It wouldn’t be the first time Dodge used Ford parts to build something. The original Dodge Deora used the upper tailgate from a 1960 Ford station wagon for it’s front windshield (that flipped up), and rear window of a 1960 Ford sedan for it’s back window.
I like it. I’m sick of the same old Aston look.
Racing success is always function over form.
Yes but only the 928 was designed to replace the 911, so major bitching points go to the 928.
Am I the only one who thinks it looks really nice?
“Why put 15 or 20 kilos of weight on the nose of a car, in the worst possible spot” for handling balance?
That one truly confuses me!
The 928 and 944/968 were water cooled at the time. The purist bitching continues.
The bro-est of all Ferraris.
How about a front that looks like a rear but is actually just...a front?
928's would fare well with good visibility at least, and they would finally be rear engined so all the purists can quit bitching.
The phrase wasn’t originated in racist tones though. It actually is used as a replacement for swearing, and that’s how it originated. Just because something originated in the south while slaves were there doesn’t make it racist. If I (I’m Latino) say a black guy “looks blue” is that “racially charged” because the…
It’s not “racist” ... it’s racially charged. It’s a phrase that originated in the slave plantations of the antebellum south. Using it to describe the actions of a black man is inappropriate.
Eh, cars are rather like cats in that what is right and reasonable is not necessarily reality.