That’s such a weird argument for people to make. As if having a degree and specialization in one area suddenly precludes his ability to understand science as a whole. Like, just because someone becomes an oncologist or whatever doesn’t mean they suddenly are incapable of learning about medicine as it relates to other…

only in your case if you called the cops on them it would actually be justified.

Nah cause female Cletuses are actually pretty easy to find *zing*

Oh yeah, I’m more of a fan of studios allowing for audience feedback before planning a sequel and making films that can stand alone instead of requiring one to watch an entire wave of movies to get all the jokes and references. Best part about Hellblazer is there’s so much source material and continuity they can mix…

Part of his path to change might be that in the five years he got away with it the husband felt bulletproof and each successful tryst gave him confidence in never getting caught. Now he’s nailed with video proof as a cheater and liar. It would be useful to know how his wife was tipped off and acquired the footage, but…

Oh yeah he’s such a catch for the CW. The NBC show had a lot of potential and a wealth of source material, but also a lot of self-imposed limits (no smoking, sex, LGBTQ mentions, and they kind of gambled with a new Chas backstory). So I was very glad to see the old boy land on his feet with a ton of Constantine…

Kaufman’s usage of Rosenberg reminds me of how in pro wrestling, at least the WWE, Vince McMahon takes any criticism of the way he runs business, or contrasting personal/political views, from fans, marks, and “smarks” and puts the words right into the dialogue of ineffectual, mealy-mouth, cowardly heels. Like “oh…

Don’t forget Dickens. And maybe Irving.

“2666" might disagree with you. Though I think Bolano could probably have cut out 100 pages in the middle and it would have been a lot more palatable given the subject matter (and it still would have been over 700 by a good margin).

I agree with you, especially about the need for Matt Ryan-Constantine to mostly shoulder the movie himself without a ton of winks and nods to a greater Justice League Dark universe. Hellblazer has hundreds of characters and a whole cavalcade of ghosts following John around for them to choose from. The great thing…

Don’t forget to let him smoke and swear onscreen! Damn you NBC.

You make some really good points and I agree with all of them, specifically how it is harder for Keanu to be totally unlikeable or as specific a bastard as Constantine is. Reeves is perfect as enigmatic dudes, but Constantine’s background and persona really kicks back against that type of magician. Of course John has…

Setting up some Trenchcoat Brigade action in a sequel. Love it. Keanu is definitely better as a mysterious Phantom Stranger type than as Constantine, who goes out of his way to shed any sort of enigmatic pretenses from his magician persona (unless he’s trying to get laid)

Tenant would be the best in my opinion. He already pretty much dressed as Constantine during his run as the Doctor and his “I’m sorry, I’m so sorry” dark side kind of reflects Constantine’s many interactions with loved ones he’s gotten killed along the way.

Yeah that meat puppet sex thing did not end so well for either party but at least Johnny got a tattoo out of it and it didn’t land him in the Lake of Fire this time.

In that case it is probably for the best that Paul Rudd was never up for the role. Nobody would believe him as an aged Constantine. Also, I don’t know if he can 1) do a British accent 2) be unlikeable enough for some of Constantine’s storylines because Rudd can handle John’s charming side but I don’t know if he can be…

I also want to see more of the character, with over 300 issues on the original run and a few reboots, there are a lot of promising storylines that a live action take could use. I was not a fan of the movie but it wasn’t awful and Tilda Swinton as Gabriel was pretty brilliant. I think Matt Ryan is fantastic as…

I probably should have indicated that I was being sarcastic and in no way serious when I was posting that. Obviously there is a ton of actual stuff that Rowling needs to be criticized for and I was just joking when it came to this. I kind of thought people would pick up on that, but, the internet sometimes makes that…

She also likely wants you to forget that one book was all about young cis-men using invisibility cloaks and polyjuice potions to sneak into women’s restrooms repeatedly.

She did mention in one of her rants that she felt like she would have been trans in another life but it was thrown in at the tail end of a bunch of uninformed and uneducated comments about trans people and “real” women’s rights and bathrooms etc. that i thought she might have been being flippant or just…