I hate the idea of going back to before the original series. Why are they so opposed to just continuing the story? Star Trek has been around for 50 fucking years. It’s almost impossible to make a prequel without violating some previously established lore. They’ve already attempted this before with Enterprise, which is…

Why are they making another prequel? Do they not remember how awful Enterprise was?

How the fuck does your comment have nearly 40 stars? Pointing out that someone is irresponsibly giving credence to an absolutely fake conspiracy theory is not “fanning flames.” Stop demonizing people for criticizing factually incorrect statements you fuckleper.

I going to very blunt and honest right now: I sincerely wish it was Palin who was just elected instead of Trump. At least she has some experience.

Elizabeth Warren also had a pretty testy exchange with Price over his conflicts of interest in which she had to be gaveled out for going over time.

Uh, you are aware that the events in the video and the video’s release both took place during Bush’s presidency, right? This in no way whatsoever involves either Obama or Trump.

This is not to say that all political figures of the period are to be outright reviled or hated for their inaction, but that we must understand the context and climate in which they lived.

We need to build a wall to keep all the illegal bears out. The Berenstain Bears will all be forced to wear “sheriff’s stars.”

Hahaha, silly foreigners and their “compassion” and “moral compasses.” Trump is going to build a wall to keep you guys out and create a paradise where you can rape anyone without consequence!

Doesn’t matter. He knowingly handled American classified information. That’s an American law that can be broken no matter where you are or who you are. The law was specifically created with the intention of it being used to prosecute foreigners.

Not we, but local officials could and then they’d extradite him. That’s what I meant, I was just too lazy to write it all out.

Was Johnson a “lukewarm liberal,” though? Maybe he was before he was president, but once he was sworn in he actually advocated and signed laws that moved us in the right direction.

because neither of those two figures mentioned believed that black people were equal to them in anyway

Yes and no. He very clearly violated the Espionage Act. However, there has never been a formal indictment of him. He’s pretty sure that if he ever leaves the Ecuadorian Embassy that he will be tried for that. A violation of the Espionage Act can be punished via the death penalty, though I doubt they would go that far.

I honestly wish it was Nixon being sworn in on Friday instead of Trump. At the very least, you never had to doubt his public service credentials or his commitment to the nation. Helo, with all of Trump’s business conflicts, Watergate looks so quaint.

Undoubtedly part of Rodgers’ public image is also him sitting through the draft as team after team inexplicably passed up on him when not a single one of them couldn’t have used an upgrade at quarterback.

I’ve always thought Kornheiser was perfectly fine. It’s Wilbon who’s the dickhead. Every once in a while he’ll be out and Dan LeBatard will sit in instead. This is great, because LeBatard is usually the shit.

I feel it’s appropriate to highlight one of the responses to the Matt Calkins tweet that was cited in the article.

“Two of the best forms of assimilable protein are organic, free range chicken eggs and whey protein made from grass fed dairy cows.”

People “vilify” Lee precisely because other people choose to honor him. Yeah, sure, he seemed like a great guy or whatever. He fought for the side that lost, for the side that betrayed my country, for the side whose entire existence was based on defending the enslavement of human beings. My point is not that he wasn’t…