emodonnell
Humboldt
emodonnell

If you ask someone who isn’t a superfan of Star Wars about Rogue One, the opinions, in my experience, range from “it’s okay,” to “it was ridiculous” to ‘I had no idea what it was about” to “I didn’t care about any of these characters” to “it was fun.”

I’m getting a major case of deja vu. Wasn’t there an obituary related to Digital Underground not too long ago? I seriously thought “again?” when I read this headline.

I thought for a second that William Hughes had just found out, decades later, about the cartridge-stacking feature and was announcing it to everyone as if it were a triumphant discovery. I thought it was kind of wholesome and cute, really.

Marijuana.

He is obviously referring to climate change, not the 2000 election. I have no idea where you get the idea that Gore’s approach to education on the subject has been superficial or redundant. An Inconvenient Truth is a deep dive into the science, and he proposes a sweeping overhaul of our consumption habits and energy

Not a commissioned officer.

This article comes off as overly hateful.”

... directed by the kid who just finished playing Opie Taylor, you inform the ’69ers, ensuring that they’ll dismiss your entire crazy story ...

The most recent development in this month-old story is buried three paragraphs into the article, and the headline says nothing about it. This is basic stuff.

The whole point of science, that I think Tyson misstated, is that it’s NOT about truth. It’s about understanding through proven methods that can be replicated.”

Claymores.

What?

Let me see if I can resolve this talking-past-each-other session.

Also, wouldn’t that mean he only really served as a spy for that one side? 

Fuck these stupid fucking slideshows. 

I had to Google it too. Not because I didn’t know what it was, though. I just have a problem.

News sources are, by definition, secondhand (unless we’re talking about the primary source of information for the article, i.e. Emma Watson or Seth Rogen). And headlines are, by definition, supposed to be the factual distillation of a story. 

It’s too bad Rodney Dangerfield did not live long enough to talk to Moe for his earlier podcast about depressed entertainers. More than anyone else, he embodied that strange emotional dichotomy that’s apparently very common in stand-up comedy. I was surprised at one point to hear him talk about it very explicitly and

Not to be a grammar Nazi in a comment section, but that phrase you coined could use some hyphens. How many times do you expect someone to re-read your comment in order to figure out exactly what cluster of words the “-esque” is attached to? Or maybe you think that latter element is a whole word instead of a suffix,