I’m talking about photos that were identical down to each tiny hair— except that one was hyper-saturated to increase contrast to make redness more pronounced and then entered as a separate piece of evidence. Heard testified that they were taken in different lighting conditions, but even her “expert” admitted that…

I am a woman. And my opinion is just as valid as yours, despite the fact that my research activities are not limited to google searches.

Nah, justice was served

I notice that your comment is still pending while a newer one pro AH is not. I also notice several approved pro AH comments with insults and condescension towards those they disagree with, while yours contains none of that. Maybe they will approve it still, I don’t know.

“.there is always someone who is the primary aggressor” There’s audio of Amber saying she was the one to start the violence. Then the article also says “victims respond with violent resistance or self-defense”. Why is the idea of Amber being a victim who respond with violent resistance believable but not Johnny?

Another comment based on ‘feelings,’ and rooted in confirmation bias. Remember that the UK case was Depp v. the Rupert Murdoch global media empire. Intelligence UK has researched the extensive failings of the UK justice system, you can read more here:

Thank you for saying what I’ve been thinking so much more concisely than I could conjure.

“The evidence Heard provided to demonstrate that she had been physically and emotionally harmed by Depp—witness accounts, photos of injuries, text messages, threatening audio[...]”

This was absolutely not the case tho’: the unedited audio, video, jpg files, as well as the majority of the testimonies (but one from Heard’…

“By that reasoning a woman can never be disbelieved.” - Preciesely. Kylie Cheung, I suggest you stop writing on this topic. You seem to be extremely biased here.

I am a progressive feminist, pro choice, leftist, anti Musk, anti Blizzard Activision, anti Cosby, anti blockchain, hate Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas... And I’m going to (fruitlessly) tell you that this echo chamber is off base and disconnected from reality.

Nope. The juror cited many reasons for not finding Heard credible, including dishonesty and altering photographic evidence. You would know that if you bothered to read what the juror actually said, instead of reading a biased second-hand account. You could also take the time to review evidence and testimony presented…

I’m no fan of Depp and I don’t think he’s an innocent sheep. He is overpaid, privileged and he is friends with known abuser Marilyn Manson. However, Amber Heard lied repeatedly on the stand when she didn’t need to. Her lies were credibly disproven by Depp’s team. She didn’t send the money to the charity and never took…

The people defending Amber Heard post-trial are exactly the type of people who go to the end of the earth to find a missing blond haired blue eyed woman, while being unable to name a single missing woman of color. 

One of the responsibilities of a juror is to assess the credibility of witness testimony. Since conflicting testimony is routine they MUST decide who they believe.

It's obvious she was the primary abuser.

That is a large jump to a conclusion. And it ignores the facts. Her statement about pledge and donated being synonymous, her deposition where she said TMZ was alerted before the TRO filing, as well as numerous people including 4 police officers contradicting her testimony all very likely played in to the fact she…

Not believing lies because they issue from a person born with a vagina is not the same as misogyny. Each of your bad takes continue to get worse, Ms. Cheung. Congratulations.

She lied. Her evidence was non-existent. She lost. Foh with this feminist superiority bullshit and move on with your life. 

The only misogyny in this case is rooted in the assertion that women cannot have a full spectrum of personality traits, including those that are deviant and socially malignant. This misogyny is compounded when the media nullifies the women who testified to Heard’s instability by suggesting they harbor idealized…

At this point it just feels like you a deluding yourself. Virtually nobody believed her, including a huge percentage of women (which I’m sure you will explain away as internalised misogyny).