What I got out of that was “Blah blah blah God Jesus blah blah blah.” I gave it about 15 seconds of eyeball time. Nope.

The article seems a touch insufferable. Not this one here on Jez, but the original. I could be wrong, but I have no intentions of clicking through to find out.

Just for the sake of accuracy, the piece being referred to in the Times is written by a self-proclaimed anti-home birth, anti-midwife OB...it was an opinion piece, not a piece of investigative journalism by the Times. It’s inaccurate to report it as such...and misleading. Fact-checking matters...when you look at the…

This article was not written by a NYTimes reporter. It is an op ed by Dr. Amy Tuteur who has a personal vendetta against home birth. She has not been a practicing OBGYN since 2003 and she is not actually a clinical instructor at Harvard Medical school. She does run a blog where she publishes vitriolic articles against…

Folks, please take this article with a grain of salt. The original author of the NYT article is a known fanatic anti-homebirther and even anti-breastfeeding crusader. The evidence isn’t new either. I’m not sure why the NYT agreed to publish this op-ed. Please know that it’s the entire medical childbirth system in the…

Wasn’t that an opinion piece? This article makes it sound like investigative reporting by the NY Times.