I am arguing that a bomb is an item that is explicitly dropped. It is not a self-propelled device. A ICBM, or Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, on the other hand is a self-propelled device. The verbiage used is important in terms of understanding the possibility of interception.

The FA is overstepping its bounds here. Plus, it doesn’t really address the problems which have created such an environment for incidences like this to happen.

In the article, the author argues about bombs. In his reply to me, the author argues ICBMs. They are not the same thing. And cannot be used interchangeably.

I do. Thanks for your concern.

Entirely possible. However, I suspect that after the Cold War and the right mess that was the Cuban Missile Crisis, the monitoring of any vessel within reasonable distance from the mainland would prevent this from happening.

Then Patrick, change your terminology. A bomb is not the same as a ICBM. The delivery device does not equate.

They are professionals. The manager’s job should be to lay out the plan. It is the explicit role of the player to make sure it is executed. It is the explicit role of the player to motivate themselves.

You’re presupposing that a North Korean bomber could get into US airspace and deliver its payload before being intercepted.

Theatre of the mind, my friend.

Please sir, could you kindly explain to me the logistics of how he expects his ass to take a knee?

Great control. That’s a goal worthy of Berbatov, Ibra, or Le Tissier.

When all is said and done, you’re looking at 22 levels spread over 11 full tiers.

I don’t know that my vote will count. It appears my chad is either dangling or hanging.

Considering how the US’ golden generation had been coddled from childhood up, is it really any surprise about how thin-skinned they are?

I expect more crokinole coverage going forward.

Mark Madden.

Sage advice from an expert:

Ah! D battery night. The last time I heard of that, involved the Mets facing the Braves when John Rocker was in relief.