Both things can be true: Johnny Depp has anger issues, and Amber Heard failed to prove she was a victim of domestic violence in court.

Beating this dead horse again, huh? Must be a slow news week.

Demme didn’t intervene on Glaudini’s behalf

also, which 50% of WW2 fighter pilots?  because hooooo booooy....

Well, about those Crusades ...

Christian Bale still wins. 39 f-bombs and someone made his tirade into a dance remix.

“Actor yelled at me 20 years ago” is not a news story.

What a shit ass thing to say

In the past, the advice to passengers in a hijacking scenario was to sit tight and comply with the hijackers’ instructions. By and large, until 9/11, that advice had worked. Some hijackings had resulted in the deaths of a few passengers but the overwhelming majority of aircraft passengers had survived hijacking…

Might be some WIP build that hasn’t gone through approval with all the decision-makers and on all platforms yet

On one hand, it makes sense.  On the other hand I feel like Microsoft might need to lay low for a little while after the ABK thing.

We’ve reached a point in the games industry where trends are moving faster than development cycles, and the results are calamitous.

It’s not terrible. It’s just not great either

“My criticism is purely the revolting nature of the message, pretending that leaving it as is, despite their full-body retching at the horror they just sold me, is some act of public service.”

This is the most joyless hatred-for-the-source-material review I’ve read. Ew.

It refers to the depiction of British people and stereotypes about living in stately homes and having butlers

Sheesh, I can see the tears between your text. Grow some thicker skin bub, you’re not even the one who’s potentially “offended” by whatever implications you’ve interpreted, this “modern audience” are so weak it causes the entirety of humanity to walk in eggshells to avoid triggering then and fully deserving a cancel…

Man, the contrast between this review and Polygon’s is wild:

So people paid $50-60 multiple times for a low-poly, low-res Lara model when they could have just jerked off to the numerous print and video ads featuring a much higher-poly and higher-res Lara in much skimpier outfits and suggestive  poses..?

you spill an awful lot of text about the supposedly offensive material, but don’t mention what it is. not even broad contours. would be helpful context to help us decide how offensive it is.