ellsworth2e--disqus
Ellsworth 2e
ellsworth2e--disqus

True, Crow still sounds like Crow pretty much. Sometimes I can't tell any of them apart. Not that big a deal though, it's all written by committee. And Tom still does a lot more of the singing.

Less of a plot point than the Marxism.

It's called Side Quest.

“seemingly cool, strangely attractive, but mostly still dorky teacher.”

It's just like the old one, it's great.

I watched this at an awesome bar, where everybody shushed for the opening and everybody clapped for the theme song.

Ric Flair is from 1949.

We're all imperfect. But we all choose, and in aggregate that's eugenics. When people try to mess with it, often because they're racist, that's just a different kind. And it's part of the aggregate but less so every day.

That's kind of a pet issue for them already.

Dating is eugenics in a nutshell.

You mean it's just a carriage with a motor?

I think I liked Star Crash the best so far but Avalanche was great, and of course Cry Wilderness.

What is that suitcase thing she keeps switching out? I love that they bothered with that kind of detail, giving her a busywork excuse to visit the theater, and then it's not explained right away. But I'm hoping Max eventually fills us in during one of the commercial breaks.

I've seen 9 of them now and I love it. My only complaint is that Tom and Crow sound too similar to each other. Sometimes I need the captions to tell me who said what.

Yeah not much use if it goes nowhere and you can outpace it on foot.

Couldn't hurt. They always oversell these projects but decent public transit, which includes rail service, is a necessary step toward anything good.

Good point and no I don't. But MST3K is mostly verbal commentary, that's why so little is lost when it's just a rifftrax audio file. I meant something like funny beards drawn on the characters in theaters where the actual film is playing. Admittedly not the greatest comparison.

He's not trying to determine others' free interpretation of his work, he's objecting to another artist forcibly changing it.

Not really. This is like doing a parody of Star Wars by putting things in front of theater screens showing Star Wars. You're not using ideas from their art to make a point about it, you're simply co-opting their art. If someone had made a different statute that had a bull and a girl, then it's fair use.

The Chinese aren't that stupid either.