In the sense that ownership is determined by law.

Sometimes. Sometimes the principles themselves are, depending on which principles we're talking about. Who even decides what intelligence is? Some of the people working on AI right now believe liberals are unintelligent. And some of them are weapons designers. The movie Short Circuit provides one possible…

Perhaps, but guess who might not agree. Or what if their AI turns out not to be as enlightened as Lt Cmdr Data and they're hoping you let it vote?

Exploring racism through AI is tricky, since racism involves human beings who are in fact equal and were not created to be servants and we're still trying to get past that notion. Whenever AI comes into being, it will be legitimately owned by someone.

I just say it's 555-1234. Seriously, no one has ever questioned that.

Goes nicely with this afternoon's GJI about a bookstore celebrating the Day Without Women by hiding works from male authors.

If we're still alive!

What did you expect? This is an entertainment site and my avatar is screaming.

Or rather they were until we got fat!

Whatever you do, just avoid judging the content of the work because that's now a male thing. There's movies where Female is the point, and movies where it isn't so we're forced to evaluate them on every other factor.

Sure, let's keep them out of action flicks and fantasies because there's no market for that gibberish anyway.

Reminds me of all those Netflix shows with titles like Female Agents. "We're blatantly pandering but we know you love it so here you go."

I think we need to view this with emotional logic, by which I mean no logic at all. Really I think people should just ignore this and go see Hidden Figures.

Or maybe just done the reverse of what they did, since the theme of the day is women's contributions disappearing.

And sometimes male romance authors use female pen names, since the audience is overwhelmingly female and doesn't like having stuff mansplained.

Paul Ryan is obsessed with the writings of a certain female, much to our collective dismay.

A portion of those are robots though, so you end up having a political argument with somebody's opinionated dishwasher.

I'll give this pope a pass on being the pope. He seems like a net positive.

Went to a party where I didn't know anyone, so I just drank the whole night through.

Playboy is not about appearance. The whole point of this character is he's loaded. The new rich might have above-average looks but for people born with money, their looks are as random as anyone else's.