This is awesome. I've been going back to "Sent Messages" and doing this after the fact, or saving the message as a draft and then flagging it before sending.

I tried this once. Ended up with hard to peel eggs that had scorch marks from where they were sitting on the racks. Wouldn't do it again.

I've found reasonable success with nonsense phrases that are still grammatically structured. Like Lucky Charms stole that 1991 pickle re-enactment!.

I dropped out after two and a half episodes. They actually made it through a full season?

What's... um... what's "pasta-shaped" mean?

I knew there was a reason I'd hearted you. :-)

I'm encouraged by his recent successes in this republican selection process. I would totally LOVE to see him go up against Obama in November. It would be almost as good as if Herman Cain got the nomination.

"objectively verifiable money damages for all injuries, psychological and physical, including loss of companionship and support, occasioned by the violation of this section"

The linked article at [excelle.monster.com] includes this, which seems like it would apply:

I couldn't force myself through to the first excerpt, sorry. This is just awful. If I were his teacher, I'd be offended - not at the attention, but at the fact that he wasn't learning a g.d. thing about writing.

Kicking him off campus might be overkill, but he should definitely have failed that course.

Your sister might look into some alternatives...

I expect it's quite possible that biological intelligence might disappear completely within 1000 years. Machines will take over all the labor, and eventually we will upload our minds into machine forms, and when we no longer have biological bodies, we will cease to reproduce biologically.

Interesting - doesn't appear to be a consistent linear change in creativity - at least as I would describe the concept of creativity (though n=1 is not really sufficient for any conclusions to be drawn (pun intended)).

Is it weird that I see Peggy as more of a girl than a woman, and am therefore a little skeeved out by her inclusion in this photo?

I was about to suggest voice recognition software, but then I realized that might also not work so well while drunk.

Kind of a no brainer that this would occur at least under certain conditions, if only because alcohol lowers inhibitions, and doesn't leave people completely incapacitated at low levels.

What metric could we use to determine their enjoyment? I'm not asking sarcastically - I'm honestly curious to know how we would be able to determine if a whale is content with their life or miserable.

Having the judge consider it is absurd, but I think it can have a PR advantage. Think of it this way: by giving the appearance of considering the matter, and rejecting it after a bit of thought & with an explanation, the judge reduces the validity of PETA's follow up argument - namely, that the "establishment" is just…

Yeow. I've wondered this for years, & long ago thought that the total number of tickets sold would be a better way to measure success/failure - assuming you're trying to gauge popularity. But then, I'm not the CFO of a Hollywood studio.