Great, a new chair teaching postmodern, neo-Marxist, identity politics drivel. Progress.

The "truth" is that only actual women use these products.

Yes, fuck all the actual women who feel erased again and again by radical trans ideology. How small of them.

Yes, yes, can those cis women objecting to being erased to pander to radical gender ideologues. Fuck them, right?

There's no evidence that catering to trans people's "feelings" has an impact on, say, trans suicide rates. Citation needed.

But this change is telling women who object to shit up. They are called TERFS and transphobes if they don't like the further erasure of women. 

Or...OR women are tired of being erased to pander to a small group of gender radicals. Is that transphobia?

I guess all the women objecting to their erasure in the service of radical trans ideology are just evil TERFS, right?

It erases women to cater to trans ideology. You don't think women have a right to object?

Um. Because we are being asked to substantiate "feeling" into law, obliterating biological reality, potentially enforcing speech, and erasing women's rights?

I did Google it, the theory postulates that women are being unfairly charged for women's products. The reality, again, is that the market sets the price. If women want pink razors, and pink razors cost more to produce, that isn't some kind of sexist conspiracy. Again, if women don't like this, they can buy men's…

Jesus, I never implied that. They’re still women, happy? I didn’t realize I had to use #not all. Still doesn’t change the fact that biological women menstruate, and trans “men” and non-binary people who menstruate are biological females. No?

Kinja, please. There is no “pink tax. “ The market will charge what women will pay, and women apparently want to pay more for products with certain “feminine” aspects. These products cost more to produce to cater to women. If women don’t like it, they can buy male razors, shampoo , and soap. This isn’t a form of…

Yeah, fuck those bigots who are tired of this unscientific, self-contradictory, illogical, hysterical, guilt-shaming, illiberal, reality-adjacent horseshit.

Corporate virtue signaling. How progressive.

Because it erases women? Because it caters to an ideology that puts trans people before women? Do you think that they women upset about this are all bigots?

Trans “men” are women.

Are you saying that the existence of intersex people means that MEN can menstruate? 

Women have uteruses. Thanks. Oh, wait, you’ll split hairs: Some women have them removed. Doesn’t make them men, and doesn’t. Mean. Men. Can. Become. Women. And. Menstruate.

“Folx" lol. Folks is already gender neutral, FFS.