No victim indeed! Just like violent porn produces no victims. Don’t know about that dude but you seem pretty confident in your assumptions

If you got microbes that can handle a thorough scrubbing of detergents and Lysol, sex dolls will be the least of our worries.

Why I don’t think sex dolls can technically be raped, the treatment of them can be telling. Does anyone remember an incident from a few months ago, where there was an electronic sex doll at some sort of non-sex related convention, and pretty much the convention goers molested the doll to the point that she broke. https…

The issue is more that they are creating a rape practice arena. Gross.

Why isn’t the article correcting the error? It makes a huge difference.

But you can simulate rape on them . I guess that makes people at Jezebel feel better

Where’s the part where they talk about “protecting plastic dolls from rape” buddy?

Except that no one said that if you read the original comments in their native language?

This is the most compelling argument against it. It’s similar logic to the American ban on simulated CP (don’t know what France’s laws are - not something to Google at work).

Slicone dolls today, something else and something closer to being more human like tomorrow. This outrage, premature as it may just be, is just a warm up to the controversy that will rear its ugly head in the future ethically and morally as Robots / Android’s / Artificial life become more human like and possibly even…

Violent rapist aren’t interested in sublimation.

Fucking a used sex doll sounds terrible.

Depressing that the press would use Google Translate for something like this.

I don’t think it’s “semantic.” I think it’s a crucial distinction. I still don’t agree with the protest, but the accusation reported here was that the service was bad because it was rape, and that’s not the protesters’ accusation.

That’s so weird. If you plug the phrase into Google Translate, you get the same error:

Just curious — would your opinion remain the same if the sex dolls were the images of little girls and boys — or babies? If you think they’re no more than a fleshlight, then you’d say yes. But could you really think that it’s a good and healthy thing? Then take that thought and put it back on the woman-image sex dolls.

Actually, she said “pretend to” rape a woman. 

Don’t shame Americans for not caring about foreign currency translations.

This is the French original:

NOOOO: ““Xdolls is not a sex shop. It’s a place that generates money and where you rape a woman.””