ellegos002
ellegos002
ellegos002

One of my favorite 3DS excess prices was this 3rd party case. Loved that thing. Too bad it broke while taking a hit for the team.

It was called trench-warfare for a reason I suppose. Best to keep your head down.

Dressing sharp is its own reward.

But we can certainly make an advantageous/disadvantageous judgement objectively. Which is what most people mean when they say good or bad in this context.

Except it wouldn't be happening right now if it wasn't for human causes. We weren't I. An upswing to be accelerated. We just made an upswing.

Yeah. Those assholes.

I mean, while the situation isn't good, I have to think that all the ice melting will do is push polar bears onto the mainland. Where they will probably be pretty dominant unless their coloring holds them back. You know, until humans decide it's easier just to start exterminating the man-eating Bears that are suddenly

Happens in movies too. A person dies, no emotional reaction from the audience. A DOG dies, and the audience is in emotional turmoil.

“ARE YOU HAPPY? WHY WOULD YOU WANT THIS?”

Just because he might be a hypocrite, doesn't mean he isn't right. Also, why are you listening to politicians one way or the other on matters of science. Listen to what scientists say about science. They tend to be better at it, and when a vast majority all agree on the same thing, it might be worth paying attention.

Motors and gas and stuff.

Which is why when you look up who is paying for the research of almost all the scientists claiming research against climate change, you tend to see a lot of oil and coal companies. I don’t know why you think the U.S would have any reason to hate oil in general if it wasn’t actually detrimental, seeing how much we are

... Independent foundations and many different nations with conflicting motives, interests, and ideologies all over the world? The U.S. Isn't the only science game in town.

We know that it isn’t volcanoes though. We are able to measure the increase in atmospheric carbon, and we know how much carbon the average volcanic eruptions jets into the atmosphere (about .26) gigatons. When adding up eruptions every year, this is nowhere near the amount that is being added to the atmosphere

And trying to find carbon free or at least neutral power sources so that we stop making a problem worse than it is. I can survive a small dose of rat poison. I probably can’t survive an entire bottle of the stuff.

That point of view is understandable, especially when each one of us IS a point of view. It doesn't really matter if humans are important in the grand scheme of things cosmically speaking, to the humans who are doing the pondering. We care about our own fate, therefore we GIVE it importance. Importance being (as far

Actually, that might not be a bad idea. Those organisms decay and release CO2 back into the atmosphere. They deposit it into the soil and fix it as well, but that is a very easily disturbed covering. Paving over them, especially if you can do it with something durable, made of carbon, and reflective of the sun’s rays

But our activities are changing it at a rapidly accelerated rate. It’s the difference between someone dying of old age or poisoning. Sure you are going to die some day anyway. Doesn’t mean anyone should be okay with the poisoning.

It has been considered and discarded as a workable theory when as we have found evidence that rejects any of the causes of warming that caused said previous warmings. We have been able to reliably rule out a major change in all other varibles (changes in solar output, volcanic activity, non-human related sources of

His hair needs to be real for that to happen.