No, you’re actually asking ‘how did he not do it’. And you seem to think he did.

The onus should, of course, be on the prosecution: what evidence is there that he did?

You’re absolutely right, it’s not. If it was the purpose, the defense would have been allowed to float other theories as to who killed Theresa, when there were SO MANY other people who had opportunity, who had violent pasts (Steven’s brothers, Scott Tadych) who lived on the compound. But they were banned from doing so.

YES! When my partner and I were watching it, I paused it right there and had a 10 minute rant about that exact line. Reasonable doubt is for EVERYONE, even people who are guilty.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Be afraid.

I was also disgusted by the prosecutor’s “reasonable doubt is for innocent people”.

I do think Avery should have been found not guilty. I’m not completely sure if he is innocent but I am 100% certain that Brendan is. Oh my god, my heart was breaking for that poor boy. He just wants to play his videogames!

Kratz’s private law firm has been attacked by viewers on Yelp.