The fancy paper lantern is right.

Is this Scrawler?

ETA: Never mind. My suspicions were confirmed when I checked out your comment history...

I’ve never learned anything from Rolling Stone.   

Hm. My girl was so bothered by Elastigirl’s fight with the Screenslaver in Incredibles 2 that she expressly forbade me from firing it up on Netflix the other day, so maybe I’ll hold off on this. But boy does she love stuff where girls kick ass.

I was torn between B and B-, to be honest. On paper, a lot of this is not all that great. Some of the ideas are shopworn, few of them are fully developed, there’s a TON of spoken exposition in like 75% of the scenes, it’s paced sort of oddly, it’s overstuffed... but I had a lot of fun. For a movie that’s aiming for…

I can’t be the only person who’s put off by the uncanny valley effect of the main character’s face, can I? It’s especially jarring when so many other actors show up as creepy cyborg people, and their human faces are the only thing that isn’t CGI.

“Cape” as a verb is right up there too.

For me it’s the fact that I have to intuit the meaning of a one-syllable word from context. It reminds me I’m old and the world is moving past me.

I’ll agree on all points, and add that I’m moderately disturbed that “stan” appears so often in this conversation. 

I’m disturbed by both the people wanting to fuck Ted Bundy and the people wanting to fuck Venom, but in different ways, and I admit, with some reluctance, that the people wanting to fuck Venom horrify me less.

Bad news, Mom. Just found out I’m problematic. Thanks for the great job raising me.

I had to look up “stan” on Urban Dictionary and now I’m mad at the internet for a whole new reason.

Wow, that lead photo of a gormless mouthbreather staring at a janky 500-tickets-at-the-arcade plastic sword is really selling that whole Arthurian grandeur, good job marketing department.

I rewatched Attack the Block recently and thought it was fantastic. Great action and effects and location filming for such a low-budget movie. Great performances too with John Boyega and Franz Drameh a great dynamic pairing (at least for a little while) and Jodie Whittaker typically excellent.

Inoccuous? Perhaps if the reporter had used a less loaded word than “screech.”

The woman covered sports. I can’t help but think that someone who came up writing respectfully about a pastime where fans sit outside in the sleet for hours half naked and covered with paint could come up with some more respectful way of describing making a joyful noise.

Spot on, this is absolute intellectual laziness on her part. From her comment she clearly knew it was a group of sorority sisters - if she were covering a sporting event and heard a group of fans making some strange noise, my guess is she would have deduced that it was a team or college cheer. As in so many of these…

The good way to respond would’ve been this:

Lot of people being really shittily dismissive of this. Everyone should take a look at the syllabus linked to get a better understanding of why you shouldn’t be acting like this is nothing. Saying “it’s just science” or “DNA doesn’t” lie ignores the fact that those parameters have been defined by people outside…

Stevie Wonder’s performance at Michael Jackson’s funeral is when I lost it. I’m tearing up again now just watching this video