eliyasj
John E.
eliyasj

that's because you need a long gun to kill a Grizzly.

You do not account for 10,000 years of constant warming, other than to say the last 35 are man-made. You and every prog/leftist say the science is done, that there is no proof on the other side. We on the other side say that your proof is flawed, and "x" this is why. Then it is you who say I know nothing of science,

I don't claim to own that, I actually tried the link and it didn't work. You're assuming a closed system in climate rather than an open system. Nor am I discounting the 1st law, I am saying if you apply the law, you have to account for solar forcing, you aren't. You are saying the sun has no impact on climate, or

Yes, I am going to base all scientific judgement on warming on 35 tears of data. CO2 accounts for little if any warming, you get more warming from sulfur and water vapor. However, most sulfur dioxide is added to the atmosphere via volcanic eruption (contrary to popular belief that it is factories, power plants etc.

lemme guess...liberal arts degree, state college...you wanted to work in the IT field but weren't smart enough, and can't find a job other than part time at Radio Shack, to pay your student loans, so now you sit in your mothers basement on the computer with a bag of chips and a bottle of Mountain Dew. You haven't

I am curious science boy, what is your education, because unless you have a PhD you aren't trumping mine.

Why is it when challenged, you guys always resort to personalized insults? There is no debate here; AGM has become your religion.

yeah never pic and choose, right:

No the science is not proven, the computer models used are flawed. There was a consensus of 97% of scientists, that is correct, however it was 3000 climate scientists specifically targeted in the poll; no astrophysicists, space weather experts, meteorologists etc.. If anyone is anti-science it is those who make

No the science is not proven, the computer models used are flawed. There was a consensus of 97% of scientists, that is correct, however it was a sample of 3000 climate scientists. If anyone is anti-science it is those who make climate change their theology. If you are willing to look, there is a ton of published

looks positively awful, with an awful soundtrack to boot.

This is a rebuttal on a blog site that has real science, not science fiction:

OMG Global Warming causes everything! Or is it Climate Change, or is it Climate Disruption. Fact: cooling causes drought, warming puts more moisture in the atmosphere. I think this has more to do with PDO and the El Nino, La Nina swing than climate change. Love the models that don't include solar forcing. Might

A fractured orbital bone justifies use of force in this instance as far as I am concerned. The militarized presence afterword not so much. The agitators in the crowd, asshats.

+1

A person intent on committing suicide will do so regardless of method available.

As stated earlier it would be interesting to see if there was a correlation between increased militarization and increased negligent homicide among police. One would have to factor in the advent of no knock warrants as well.

they were tidy whitey's, not so tidy, and the TV version which are padded so the bits don't show.

wasnt it boiling water?

unless your a climatologist