elev8r
elev8r
elev8r

the safest position is actually in the center seat in the back. but no normal human does that because installing and uninstalling the seat is way more difficult and getting a 30 pound child out from the center of a sedan is a recipe for back problems. beyond that, it makes no difference whether you put it on one side

i love the idea, but no manufacturer wants to probably because those child seat guidelines change so fast and any seat would be at least 3 years old by the time it hit the market. or its just straight up liability concern. No automotive crash test tests for infants or toddlers.

maybe i’m misunderstanding, but shouldn’t it be the opposite? Like the large opening with the seat down should be behind the driver, so that the car seat can be behind the passenger, and unaffected by the other down seat. I drive like this 90% of the time as a cellist with a baby.

Most of this stuff mentioned is waaay to obvious to be a miniscule feature.

this has all been decided the moment Demoltion Man came out in 1993:

The Telluride should be a trim level on a special edition Grand Cherokee

Transits are trash for normal consumer use and that’s why hardly anyone buys them compared to real minivans

Yes but...these types of ups and downs are predictable and natural in a healthy economy and yet it always seems to take everyone by surprise. 

Not brake engineer here: when it’s remotely cold my Tesla regent braking barely works so I’m using the brake a lot in the winter. I’m sure Elon forgot winter exists in some parts of the world. 

I’d rather have a newer fiat 500 convertible, maybe that makes me crazy

I think that’s the point. The Z06 is a great value, but that proposition is lost in a 150k car. 

This looks like a Chinese knockoff of a BMW

agreed...my wife has a 2017 Jetta and when I drive it occasionally I’m always pleasantly surprised of the fit and finish and how it reminds me of an A4. It could easily be the opposite in a bad way like “geez this A4 reminds me of my wifes Jetta, yikes who would pay for that” and that is where chevy is stuck.

do you have a corvette or a ZR1?

I want the 2 front seats and nothing else 

i’ve heard that logic, but also if that were true nobody would flip houses and make money at it.

perhaps we should

its also possible that this clause violates an anti discriminatory housing act, but it would take a lawsuit to challenge it. the contract may very well be unenforceable, but if no one ever challenges it, you would never find out.

Sorry but its not all BS, some outlets cite figures are inflated due to counting deductions that are available to other industries. conservatively its still a huge number. tax law is made by people and just because some of these breaks have been available to the oil and gas industry for 100+ years doesn’t mean its

that said, I don’t see the F150 or Silverado anywhere on this list.