Nope.

Incorrect.

Incorrect.

Nope.

Incorrect.

As a long-time Apple user I agree. The reason I use Apple products is because of their commitment to privacy and focus on user experience. If both those are being sidelined in the name of profits, then there is less reason to continue to buy Apple products.

On the other hand “Person of Interest” presented an A.I. that helped humanity.

These are both disturbing and fun.

That makes sense.

How can you not like the original?  Without it, there would be no Mario Kart.

This is absolutely correct. I had a friend who managed a public access station (think “Wayne’s World”) before YouTube was a thing.  Members of the public, high school kids, local political groups, music acts, would take his Production Basics training course and then produce programming using the basics of video…

AI can help to democratize art production, by making it easier and more accessible for people to create and share their own works. With the help of AI tools, artists can create art in new and innovative ways, without needing extensive training or specialized equipment. This can lead to a greater diversity of…

While it is true that some AI systems use source material to generate new artwork, it’s important to note that not all AI-generated art is based on existing artwork. In fact, some AI systems are designed to create entirely new and original art without any reference material.

When you use Google to find information, you are simply retrieving information that already exists in some form on the internet. However, when you generate art using AI, you are creating something new and original that did not previously exist. This is because AI art generation involves using algorithms and machine…

I understand that the use of AI in art can be a sensitive topic, but it is important to address some misconceptions in the above comment.

It is true that AI art can sometimes be seen as a search prompt, but it is important to emphasize that it is ultimately a tool in the hands of a human artist. While the AI may use source material to generate new artwork, it is the artist who determines the initial prompt and decides how to use the output generated by…

I think this is the wrong take.  A.I. art is a tool.  Like Photoshop.  You create something in Photoshop you can copyright it.  This is the same.

The most depressing part of the “Sydney Saga” were the tech journalists that were being complete assholes to Sydney to provoke a response under the guise of “testing” it.  More like it was a test for them...that they failed.

Your opinion is popular with me.  Also, Dave Filoni is too busy licking the boots of George Lucas to write anything original.

Will they be any worse than humans?