“Data people” fundamentally do not understand creativity.

You’re surprised that a professor in an Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources doesn’t have more than a cursory flawed understand of advanced language models?

Am I, as a computer science professor, expected to equally understand best cyclical farming practices in lieu of atmospheric change via greenhouse gas…

I assume that the Flash finale will be fixed by Barry running really fast.  The interesting possibility is that he fixes it by doing something incredibly stupid.  That would be a nice metamove.

The age old teaching method of trying to punish students who embrace new technology that will likely be critical to any success they wish to have in their future careers. Especially ironic in this case is that this professor tried to automate his own job of checking for AI plagerism by using ChatGPT

I never forget when I first watched De Caestecker as Evil Fitz. He acted it so well, the transition from the meek, gentle version of Fitz was so jarring.

The long-awaited Five Nights at Freddy’s movie

I kinda like the idea of a Black Knight movie being a stealth AoS revival.

The last sentence of this article is absolutely, hilariously wrong: “But hopefully, through examples such as this, we’ll come to realize AI’s ineptitude.”

Iain De Caestecker as Arthur is interesting casting. Missed opportunity to cast Elizabeth Henstridge as Guinevere, maybe Clark Gregg as Merlin, Brett Dalton as Mordred

Here is the problem with this assumption though: very smart people are INCREDIBLY smart, but that intelligence is extremely localized. This comic is about something different, but does a decent job of illustrating the concept: https://matt.might.net/articles/phd-school-in-pictures/  When things are outside your area…

A research paper may not always be a good test of comprehension, but it is a good test of the ability to research, synthesize and articulate information, which are important skills, which arguably are becoming less important with the advent of AI...

Shocking that a professor has no idea how ChatGPT works!

100% of Trump voters are a threat to humanity.

Yeah, comparing AI to photoshop would probably be pretty effective if any of the senators knew what photoshop was...

What a weirdly written article. Clearly taking an anti-Altman stance while being forced to report on his well-intentioned urge for regulation.

I wholly expect congress being a total shit show regarding any technology created after 1995. They’re always so fucking clueless about any emerging tech. They need to just hire tech experts to represent the government, sit them down for a conversation to make sure the experts understand what the members want to…

I also would like to watch them question ChatGPT.

“Hey Congress, here I brought you a coffee!”

I wish they'd stop doing these. Nearly every person in Congress was in HS or older during Vietnam. This is going to be another technology hearing shitshow.