yeah, right ... like ann is gonna let facts and logic get in the way of bashing one of her left-wing boogie men ... no doubt he'll be blamed for causing her to leave the "christ" out of "christmas", too

i think i got a little corny in my eyes ... it's making them water

it was weird, right? because i know oprah ain't stupid, and i know she ain't naive

thank you, dear ... i know that you are right ... and i'd rather see my daughter fulfill her potential in life than look good for shallows

thank you, truly ... oddly enough, since i chipped a couple of my hillbilly teeth on microphones while in rock and roll mode, i don't feel so bad ... yeah, my grill looks even funkier, but whenever i look at myself in the mirror, i see the memories

according to mia's blog, "it started as a voiceover demo that morphed into a crazy video project" ... she did all the vocals, hair, makeup, and costumes, and a friend shot and edited it

john krasinski didn't tweet that ... jimmy kimmel did as a prank, but also as part of his christmas gift ... kimmel bought krasinski, a friend and neighbor, his twitter name from the girl who'd grabbed it before krasinski could ... this was the first tweet, made while kimmel was presenting the gift to krasinski last…

oprah's recent, culturally-obtuse broadcast on india leaps to mind

i worked on the talent side of the biz for many years, but i got tired of the feeling that actors were just furniture being moved around, and i switched to the other side of the camera ... yeah, i still have to deal with users and abusers, not to mention watching people who are total assholes or dumb as bricks get…

this is a union shoot ... it *really* is harder to find non-established actors who are willing to risk their fragile marketability by doing soft porn ... plenty are, no doubt, but it's harder, especially if you are looking for union actors who will not only do full nudity, but full nudity on a non-closed set

they are probably buying, screenprinting, and replacing the merch at a loss to themselves

my guess is that these producers auditioned this woman with a scrubbed script, slipped an innocuous nudity paragraph (if any) past her agent in prelim, had her rush-sign the contract on set, and then relied on her being unwilling to stop production to challenge their "oops! script change!" ... so, yeah, probably…

yeah ... my guess is that they are looking to use discovery to find some sort of pattern of fraud ... you know, casting giving actors scripts without nudity, slipping nudity clauses past their agents, and then not telling actors that "whoops! we changed the script" until they are already on set, when there is huge…

if she auditioned with a script that did not require her character to do a nude scene, it's not unreasonable for this actree to believe that she wasn't going to be doing a nude scene ... not every character takes their clothes off on cinemax

she def would have an agent ... unless she just uses a lawyer (but at her level i doubt it) ... and, yeah, the agent should have informed her that the nudity clause was in her contract

my guess here is that, although the script with which this actress had been presented before signing her contract did not contain the sex scene, her contract had a nudity clause ... hence their ability to pressure her with it ... and rightfully so ... because shutting down production to recast someone who's refusing…

dang!

you miss my point entirely ... my point was to describe the events from the couple's point of view, and how upsetting it would be for them, not you, to have the critical privacy of kate's hospital room invaded by the media ... and the fact remains that the coroner's inquest did find the paparazzi culpable ... and…

i was feeling kinda blue ... but then i was reminded that i don't have a ball sack under my chin, not to mention milk patches, so although i am still feeling blue, i am now more accepting of my body

the paparazzi were, in fact, found culpable by the coroner's inquest after princess diana's death, as was her driver ... which is why it is quite reasonable for prince william to blame them for his mother's death (which he does), and why he might, also reasonably, be fearful for his wife and their unborn child