I will answer, but first, does this mean that you no longer wish to offer Anya Hurlbert as an example of an evolutionary psychologist?

Matt Ridley isn’t a psychologist of any kind. He’s a science writer. His formal training is in zoology; his dissertation was about pheasants, not humans.

I asked you, What evolutionary psychologist is saying pink is a “feminine color”?

I did look up the authors and the journal and paper (and read the paper). Neither author has any background in evolutionary behavioral science.

You said, Evo psych gender studies never seem to get even basic history right. “Pink is a feminine color because...”. Which I take to mean that you are saying evolutionary…

The article says, “according to two British neuroscientists.” This was published in the journal Current Biology.
Am I correct then in understanding your example of poor evolutionary psychology comes from two researchers who are not evolutionary psychologists and who did not publish their paper in a psychology journal?

What evolutionary psychologist is saying pink is a “feminine color”?

Can you cite me the study on color preference?

You’re not even trying.

Much of this is wrong. This myth is debunked (with academic sources) here: http://www.skepticink.com/incredulous/20…