So even though everyone says that the time slot is historically Nintendo’s, it’s still somehow their fault that it conflicts with someone else’s? Wow! Like I said before...Silence is useful here.

Avoid troll. Forward roll is useful here.

Reeks of Nintendo hate. Silence is useful here.

Read what I said again. Nintendo is single handedly keeping the WiiU “afloat” which means, stopping it from sinking or head above water. It doesn’t mean it’s successful, it just means it’s hanging on for dear life. My main argument is that no other game publisher can do what Nintendo have managed and continue to do…

“I’m not sure Nintendo franchises are enough to support an entire platform”

C’mon, there’s nothing racist about stating a cultural fact; however bygone of an era it is, it still exists in some form today. I’m half Japanese and suicide, although not rampant, is still very much an option amongst the younger generation today.

Calling all WiiU naysayers and graphics whores! Please, please say something. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!

Name a single game which features amiibo support, that you wouldn’t consider “a full experience” without it.

There are only 2 criticisms I can lay at Nintendo’s feet concerning amiibo’s:

I never said I couldn’t tell the difference in graphics. I said I couldn’t see anything that couldn’t be done on the ps3 albeit with lower resolution. The lighting effects are good but not great and same goes for the draw distance. In regards to having “so many more objects on screen at once...”, what exactly are you…

I think we can finally put the rest the argument that the WiiU isn’t more powerful than the ps3/Xbox. This game wouldn’t be possible on either of those systems as it is.

I think the best method is to be coherent. I appreciate it when someone takes the time to expantiate on their thoughts but it has to make sense and be put together with care. Why spend the time writing all those words if you won’t spend a little more time ensuring it’s understandable. Unless your aim was to make it…

Having empty slots does suggest that there was a plan in place but work started after the main game was complete. This is his main point and I don’t think there’s a soul out there that thinks smash Bros isn’t chocks full of features as it is. Have you heard that there is a poll going on for the next dlc character?…

Dude, I read that post twice and I came away feeling half-baked (for lack of a better expression). It’s most certainly a rant. not so coherent, but a rant nonetheless

I think a line needs to be drawn somewhere and a difference in opinion is not the same as being near-intimidating and disruptive.

Everyone, please remember this trailer. When actual in-game, hands on footage is released in some months time, I would like to see a comparison video and then read all the comments about what a downgrade it is blablabla...

I think a lot of people will go to any length to convince themselves that they made a good purchase with the Vita. I’ve had mine since launch and while it is a good machine, I think I would’ve been better served waiting until the end of it’s life cycle and picking it up then.

Agree 100%. Definitely not gonna be playing a game like Bloodborne on the Vita.

Cool. Will add you. Look out for me

Cool. My whole point was that in my opinion, the game still looks great in it’s present form.