They call those outliers or artifacts. When you do the most basic data cleanup, the firs thing is always to establish a baseline and remove the artifacts.

Trolls gonna troll.

Sorry, Pete, but the vast ocean of misinformation is coming from one side. And it’s not the side of the climate scientists.

You’d prefer over 97% of climate scientists to write the headline? Then would you be ok with it?

This line of reasoning has already been roundly and thoroughly debunked. Please do keep up.

The idea that global warming is linked to sun activity is not being ignored. It was disregarded as BS because the sun’s intensity has not changed. The suns intensity has actually diminished slightly over the last couple of decades(not in a significant way). It is being disregarded because it’s a statement people who…

The scientists and people with IQ over 110 know what to believe.

Which part? In all seriousness and all internet snark aside, what part to you have a problem with? Is it the clear gradual increase in temps? The method depicting them? I mean, comparing a series of numbers with one another can’t get more apolitical.

No.... no they can’t. We have already passed the turning point like a decade ago...

Politicizing this issue did a huge disservice to society. Politicians are full of shit, and now nobody knows what to believe. Bottom line though, conserving can’t be a bad thing.

The sad thing is that your comment is typical of the climate change deniers. It is truly sad that I would be considered a “RINO” merely because I do believe climate change is occurring. The fact that it is politicized and party base ideologues cling to the platform and deny the reality without any basis in knowledge…