A person who uses expressions like “corporatist duopoly” in her comments should perhaps refrain from throwing bricks at Samantha Bee for her rhetoric.
A person who uses expressions like “corporatist duopoly” in her comments should perhaps refrain from throwing bricks at Samantha Bee for her rhetoric.
Good for you.
I apologized for the comment I made.
Edited:
.
You didn’t point out flaws in any argument.
That wasn’t a typo, though.
You’re trying to play games and, I’m sorry, I’m not a child, so I can’t indulge you.
I’m not taking that child seriously any longer.
If you can’t spell a word, DON’T USE IT.
Stop pretending to be thick.
Because we’re talking about society wide issues.
Red Shoe Diaries 8: The soft-core continues.
It’s what the grand-daughter of a sugar baron who decided to marry into the Almanach de Gotha wears at her “casual” “thrown together” beach wedding in Cuba with 400 guests flown-in.
Now they just got to get the label out of its “Upper East Side blonde” rut.
And you’re lame. *shrug*
I wasn’t intending to condescend. So I apologize if that’s how it came off.
Because they don’t give a shit and we do.
The problem for me is not “ownership”. That’s when the ideas of cultural appropriation go to far, I agree.
it’s NOT a strawman. I have seen and heard arguments against wearing any garments, or eating foods, or playing musical styles, belonging to another group. On this very site and The Muse and other websites and blogs on the Internet! More than once!