In NYC what culture you grew up in generally determines whether you have ‘n’ word privileges.

Cardi B. is awful. I can’t stand her voice and I’m not a fan of the laconic flow that a slow ten-year-old can emulate, nor of the juvenile commitment to material rumblings and little of emotion substance. So I can’t watch the video and have a truly informed opinion of the points this article raises.

You don’t protect the shittiest, least-qualified members of your profession when they are being specifically criticized for being the shittiest, least-qualified members. You do your best to get new members who meet the standard.

The issue is pretty clear-cut to me. Unless your patch notes are routinely full of jokes and things that players should give little credence I do not see why your patch note should contain an intentional falsehood that people are likely to take seriously.

That was a great prank that I did not fall for unlike you, but as LeepNasty says, an April Fool’s prank article by a magazine and a false patch note are quite different.

It’s Judge’s responsibility to strike out less, not be saved from ignominy by Girardi. I was disappointed for a moment when Judge had a 30+ consecutive games reaching base safely streak and Girardi pinch-hit him to ruin it. And then I got over it immediately, because it’s not Girardi’s responsibility to help Judge…

Why stop there? I mean, the legal system failed her and he’s like totally a bad guy and she’s a victim, why can’t she just kidnap him and hold him for ransom until she gets some goddamn justice?

The NFL can’t win because their goals are bogus. They are doing this because of the PR. It’s business. They don’t care about their players and who their players are interacting with. And they don’t deserve a pass for royally fucking up what is the most important part of implementing extrajudicial punishment: being…

Okay, then.

“good half season”

I think Gallo’s floor is a flat in Tokyo playing NPB. He takes a few walks and he mashes homers, but if the homer power slips just a little he’s not that useful an MLB player, especially given that while power has traditionally been overvalued (and overcompensated) one-dimensional (or nearly so) sluggers are seemingly…

Rob Deer was what I was thinking, too.

So you’re more of a Shakespearean rom-com type?

You’re arguing a straw man. Even after repeated posts you have zero evidence of an argument on my behalf of some sort of obligation of leniency toward Robinson. Yet every argument you make to somehow deny that intent or motive is a reasonable factor in the consideration of an act and punishment for the offender, if…

So you didn’t see American Pie? You’ve never treated yourself to the (now-dated) millennial “classic” high school “comedy” which takes up the mantra of coming-of-age sex antics—Porky’s for the millennial generation?

Let me give you an example so you can stop this nonsense about how intent doesn’t matter:

I didn’t know we were really having a serious discussion. I posted a sarcastic comment indicating my distaste for burning cities to the ground for not removing statues honoring Confederate figures and you referenced that it worked for Sherman.

I never said anything about good intentions. I said intention matters and detailed a difference between knowing willful maliciousness and the reality that things may be less than that.

Richard Sherman doesn’t sack cities. He doesn’t even sack quarterbacks much.

So it doesn’t matter if someone is knowingly and intentionally causing harm vs. being oblivious or otherwise deficient in their ability to recognize whether something is harming others, or the depth of that harm?