Actual, honest question:

It’s about the implication.

Bathroom manifestoing seems more “Martin Luther’s theses” and less Instagramy than I’d have expected from the youths. But whatever works. Go Canadian teenage summer school girls!

The robot car won’t ask me if I’m married, or whether I’ve ever had a Ghanian/Nigerian/Filipino/Russian boyfriend before. Or tell me it doesn’t “believe in” transpeople, like they’re fucking unicorns.

Considering that 50% of the licensed population can’t seem to figure out how to navigate a four way stop sign, my answer is yes. I would absolutely get into a driverless car.

I would give up driving in a heartbeat. And I’ll do anything to take control away from the people the State of Utah has seen fit to “license.”

I will never have to suffer under the weight of sobriety ever again.

srsly. If you give me a choice between: a) an Uber/Lyft with a car that smells like weed and a driver who talks too much; or b) a driverless car, I’m taking the driverless car.

I would. It sounds like fun, and I’m really looking forward to being able to just ride in the car and read/watch stuff/look out the window rather than having to drive.

absolutely i would. i cannot wait for our roads to be filled with nothing but self driving vehicles. deaths will go way down and i won’t ever have to fly again. double yay.

Nobody embrasses Daddy’s Little Girl. Nobody.

I’m sure this is standard operating procedure for China. But I would also guess that any factories related to Trump enterprises are at the top of the ‘protected’ list.

Well, you know, this isn’t suspicious at all.

I do have to say that it does bother me that the standards for being on air network talent are apparently higher than being President of the United States. But that a problem with voters not network tv.

Thank you. I was reading the comments, horrified at people’s reactions. Yes, the Duggars are horrible, and their real reasons for this lawsuit are bullshit. But this kind of information should have never been made public. I work at a rape crisis center, and we see tons of kiddos who are victims of sexual abuse, as…

I have similar feelings. Obviously the Duggar clan wants revenge for Josh and their brand being tarnished. On the other hand, publishing details of a minor’s sexual abuse as tabloid fodder is gross and I don’t blame the two daughters here for being angry.

And that’s the sad thing about all this: that despite their true motives for the lawsuit being vile, the lawsuit itself has merit and they’ll probably win. They’ll see it as a victory for “religious freedom” or something, too.

How does that make sense? All this lawsuit does it put the story BACK on the front page, thus causing them to lose more money and face whatever consequences flow from making this a story again.

I completely agree with this lawsuit. A minor’s testimony to the police about being molested should not be published in a rag.