Have you seen the footage from most security cameras? The resolution is so poor you’d have a hard time proving that your car HAD fenders, quite apart from the question of whether one had a scratch or not.

Maybe. But that tape is usually conveniently taped over rather quickly.

Two things:

If you starred that comment, you just acknowledged, consented, and entered into a binding contract pursuant to the terms therein with Ask A Lawyer.

Unconscionable!

Ask a Lawyer is a practicing lawyer with over 15 years of broad legal experience. He is part of the team at Unwonk Podcast and can be found on Twitter. Keep in mind that this is general information, and not formal legal advice or legal representation; if you need any of that, you should get it from a lawyer in real…

Bah! Don’t worry. they’ll just play the shell game. Get ready for a new line up!

He’s going to ride his unicorn

I hope you don't buy Ford, GM, Chrysler, Toyota, or Honda either to name a few.

I know if someone asked me to pilot it, despite all the modeling and accurate correlation to test results, I’d feel a lot better if the seat were made by Martin-Baker.

I think you mean “tomato tomato”

Science is always wrong. By definition it’s always going to be an approximation of the truth, getting asymptotically closer to that truth but never precisely reaching it. Yet despite this, it’s nearly always more correct than people who argue with it based on “gut feelings.”

And is it an African or a European launch pad?

Not as often as gut feelings.

Thankfully, science is not based on gut feelings.

I thought the same thing.