egojab-old
egojab
egojab-old

*every single thing

I didn't say the world wasn't affected, I said the world "wasn't as affected by 9/11 as Americans were". Yes, lots of people died, no, a decade on, we shouldn't be viewing single thing from the perspective of "what about 9/11?!"

Because it's Seoul, not New York. The entire world wasn't as affected by 9/11 as Americans were, thinking that is should permeate every part of their culture is, frankly, stupid. In fact, I think it's kind of stupid that it still permeates every part of our life/culture.

Why does google keep letting this guy talk in public?

The "good artists copy, great artists steal" quote/comment, as originally said by Picasso, and later reiterated by Jobs, has been misinterpreted by many trying to paint Jobs' quote in a poor light. In reality, Picasso, and Jobs, both were saying that simply taking something someone else has done, and calling it your

I didn't say they never said it was beta, I just said that they don't do it just because Google showed they could get away with releasing crap products just because they put "beta" on it. It's beta because it has to be, in order to learn conversational context it has to be used. This is simply a product that has to

It's "obvious" because that is what you want it to be about. But whatever.

Yeah, because Apple cares that little about the user experience. /sarcasm

These aren't suits against Android, these are design patents, against the industrial design and customizations Samsung made to Android. If Samsung never created their TouchWiz skin to look so much like iOS, we wouldn't be seeing these complaints.

I think what a lot of people are missing, and the only reason Siri is Apple's only real, publicly released beta software, is that it's a learning system. It will improve over time. It's unfinished because the only way to really finish it is to get it in as many hands as possible and have the language learning system

So much hatred. So much delusion. How can anyone side with Apple? Because its obvious that Samsung went through a stage where the copied the hell out of Apple. And, yeah, Apple must just be winning because the got so lucky that they ended up with the most ignorant judges all around the world. THAT's the most likely

But they aren't discriminatory contracts, they don't stop their suppliers from selling to the competition. Their supply chain advantage isn't because they say "we'll pay you to not sell to Motorola" it comes from saying "we need 15 million touchscreens this year, and we'll pay for all of them right now, in cash" and

You are missing the point, and the complaint, by a mile.

Moving their site? That doesn't even make sense. These aren't google hosted sites, they are just sites hosted anywhere that chose something besides Adwords, and we're penalized for it.

Their supply chain advantage is not a result of a monopoly, it's a result of assloads of cash.

Only if they use their position to exert control over the market.

It's not illegal to be good at something, it's not illegal to have a monopoly. It is illegal to use your position as a monopoly to exert unfair control over the market, e.g. Penalizing a site's search ranking because they use a competing ad platform on their site.

Many of these things weren't common at the time the patents were filed, and they've only become expected because a company made something function extremely well.

Did you even read the post?

Cars weren't the first things to have 4 wheels. It was a progressive design advancement from horse drawn wagons. The auto industry was brought to life by the combustion engine, it had 0 to do with the number of wheels.